Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Apple Invites

    (www.apple.com)
    651 points openchampagne | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
    Show context
    roddylindsay ◴[] No.42934839[source]
    Brilliant move.

    The transition of the major social networks over the last 10-15 years -- from being a space for friends to interact to being a space to consume content produced by "unconnected" entities like influencers -- has created a huge opening for someone to claim the friends and family network. There is no one better positioned (at least in the U.S. where iPhones are the majority handset) than Apple.

    replies(7): >>42935400 #>>42938740 #>>42938909 #>>42938981 #>>42939123 #>>42943448 #>>42945179 #
    pkamb ◴[] No.42938981[source]
    I think Apple already has claimed the "friends and family network" via iMessage. Did Facebook go to a groups/influencer algorithm by choice or is it the result of IRL friend posters all moving to private chats once everyone got iPhones?
    replies(7): >>42939186 #>>42939323 #>>42939343 #>>42939361 #>>42939722 #>>42965086 #>>42976344 #
    1. eknkc ◴[] No.42939343[source]
    Everytime iMessage is mentioned, I do a double take because it is almost non existent here in Turkey. And from what I hear, seems like most Europeans do not use it too.

    WhatsApp has like 99.9% market share here and I assume it is a lot bigger than anything else in the EU too.

    I wonder why is that though. Everyone around me has an iPhone basically and I haven’t received a blue bubble in years. The messages app is not even on my home screen.

    replies(4): >>42939373 #>>42939455 #>>42939726 #>>42949454 #
    2. stevage ◴[] No.42939373[source]
    Can also report WhatsApp has 100% of the backpackers meeting each other market.
    3. pkamb ◴[] No.42939455[source]
    As I understand it, many Americans (and all iPhones?) had unlimited-SMS phone plans circa 2009. So the pay-per-message economic conditions that caused many Europeans, etc., to switch to WhatsApp back in the day didn't do anything in the USA.

    Then when the same iPhone app seamlessly started sending iMessages (blue bubbles) to other iPhones rather than SMS (green bubbles), people just kept using that.

    replies(2): >>42946569 #>>42948221 #
    4. brap ◴[] No.42939726[source]
    Same, I’m not even European, but literally everyone uses WhatsApp for everything where I live, iPhones or not.

    The only thing I get in my Messages app is verification codes and spam.

    I don’t think I got a single SMS/iMessage from a human in the last 5 years.

    5. basisword ◴[] No.42946569[source]
    >> So the pay-per-message economic conditions that caused many Europeans, etc., to switch to WhatsApp back in the day didn't do anything in the USA.

    I see this listed as the reason often but I had unlimited SMS then too. In fact I remember visiting the US in 2009 and I was charged to send AND receive an SMS which was a shock.

    I think the actual reason is that communication across borders in Europe is very common and those SMS's were not included in the unlimited plans as they were messages abroad. So they were subject to fees (usually high ones). I think this is the reason it was common - especially given how common it is for students to study 'abroad' in other European countries. There were a few competing apps for this at the time (Vibr I think was another but was more call focussed) but WhatsApp won in the end.

    replies(3): >>42947138 #>>42948313 #>>42948413 #
    6. yurishimo ◴[] No.42947138{3}[source]
    Yepp, this is my theory too. When you live in a country with friends 2 hours away by car in a totally different country, paying extra for "long distance" is absurd when tools exist to communicate with no extra fees.
    7. thisissomething ◴[] No.42948221[source]
    This is definitely what happened in Brazil.

    When Whatsapp launched, SMS still wasn't free, the exception being some carriers that offered "free" SMS to numbers of the same carrier if the sender was on a premium coverage plan. In sum, majority of the population was still paying $0,10-$0,20 despite already having data plans. So it was an easy win for WhatsApp.

    8. thegeomaster ◴[] No.42948313{3}[source]
    Viber is alive and well nowadays and is the dominant messaging app in quite a few geographies. Given that Facebook Messenger seems to also have about the same MAU as WhatsApp (and seems to be dominant in the US), I don't think you can say any one of those "won".
    replies(1): >>42961402 #
    9. thoroughburro ◴[] No.42948413{3}[source]
    >> So the pay-per-message economic conditions that caused many Europeans, etc., to switch to WhatsApp back in the day

    > I think the actual reason is that communication across borders in Europe is very common and those SMS's were not included in the unlimited plans as they were messages abroad. So they were subject to fees (usually high ones).

    So, you completely agree with what you seem to be taking issue with.

    10. arkh ◴[] No.42949454[source]
    > Everyone around me has an iPhone

    You may be in a bubble.

    Huawei and other Chinese phones are not banned in the EU. So you can get your hands on 100€ to 200€ smartphones which are more than enough for most people. Hence a lot less iPhones (but a ton more spywares).

    11. basisword ◴[] No.42961402{4}[source]
    >> Viber is alive and well nowadays and is the dominant messaging app in quite a few geographies

    Interesting! I haven't heard mention of Viber since around 2011. When I said WhatsApp 'won' I meant that wherever I have been in Europe WhatsApp seems to be in use by people and by businesses. It's almost accepted you'll have an account and used as an alternative to email/phone numbers. I understand global MAU may show a different reality and certain locales may still be dominated by other platforms.