←back to thread

112 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
lokar ◴[] No.42200889[source]
I see apple as like LVMH, but for phones. It has a minority of overall sales, but a majority of the “luxury” part of the market. This gives them influence over the whole market, but not a real monopoly.
replies(7): >>42200914 #>>42201067 #>>42201094 #>>42201131 #>>42201148 #>>42201290 #>>42210472 #
makeitdouble ◴[] No.42201290[source]
This was the old Apple under Jobs.

Tim Cook made it a juggernaut that holds more than half the market in many areas, can buyout whole supplies of a specific technology (e.g. TSMC and their 3nm process?), influences the relationships with a whole country (China) and has the size to weather most battles (e.g. the fight with the EU).

replies(1): >>42203253 #
Cumpiler69 ◴[] No.42203253[source]
The magic of vertical integration.
replies(1): >>42205047 #
account42 ◴[] No.42205047[source]
More like the magic of decades without sufficient antitrust enforcement.
replies(1): >>42205226 #
rogerrogerr ◴[] No.42205226[source]
People here are always telling me that modern MacBooks are nothing special and I can get a better deal on a Windows laptop. Which is it? Seems like it can’t be a monopoly _and_ face stiff competition from Windows.

(I’m not interested in the green-bubble stuff; that argument holds no weight with me - especially since iOS supports RCS now)

replies(2): >>42205619 #>>42210478 #
1. Glyptodon ◴[] No.42210478[source]
I don't know what "geen bubble stuff" means, but it's totally plausible that there's a monopoly on mobile devices and/or the app store, but not on PCs overall.