←back to thread

112 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
lokar ◴[] No.42200889[source]
I see apple as like LVMH, but for phones. It has a minority of overall sales, but a majority of the “luxury” part of the market. This gives them influence over the whole market, but not a real monopoly.
replies(7): >>42200914 #>>42201067 #>>42201094 #>>42201131 #>>42201148 #>>42201290 #>>42210472 #
makeitdouble ◴[] No.42201290[source]
This was the old Apple under Jobs.

Tim Cook made it a juggernaut that holds more than half the market in many areas, can buyout whole supplies of a specific technology (e.g. TSMC and their 3nm process?), influences the relationships with a whole country (China) and has the size to weather most battles (e.g. the fight with the EU).

replies(1): >>42203253 #
Cumpiler69 ◴[] No.42203253[source]
The magic of vertical integration.
replies(1): >>42205047 #
account42 ◴[] No.42205047[source]
More like the magic of decades without sufficient antitrust enforcement.
replies(1): >>42205226 #
rogerrogerr ◴[] No.42205226[source]
People here are always telling me that modern MacBooks are nothing special and I can get a better deal on a Windows laptop. Which is it? Seems like it can’t be a monopoly _and_ face stiff competition from Windows.

(I’m not interested in the green-bubble stuff; that argument holds no weight with me - especially since iOS supports RCS now)

replies(2): >>42205619 #>>42210478 #
Cumpiler69 ◴[] No.42205619[source]
The anti-trust issues are related to the iOS marketspace. MacBooks has nothing to do with this. Please stop injecting your conjecture to move the goalposts of the discussion.
replies(1): >>42205815 #
rogerrogerr ◴[] No.42205815[source]
Okay, Cumpiler69. Thanks for keeping the discussion professional.
replies(1): >>42206233 #
1. preciousoo ◴[] No.42206233[source]
I agree with you for the most part but is all this necessary?