←back to thread

212 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
itsoktocry ◴[] No.42199122[source]
What's hilarious is when people boast about being "in Forbes" like it's the magazine from 20 years ago, and not this parasitic SEO operation that publishes garbage on anything.
replies(2): >>42199690 #>>42199702 #
pimlottc ◴[] No.42199702[source]
Well, of course; “Forbes” still carries prestige and cachet. If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.
replies(1): >>42200052 #
1. maeil ◴[] No.42200052[source]
> If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.

It would, as this scam relies on the domain authority, regardless of their "offline authority".