←back to thread

212 points pseudolus | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
1. itsoktocry ◴[] No.42199122[source]
What's hilarious is when people boast about being "in Forbes" like it's the magazine from 20 years ago, and not this parasitic SEO operation that publishes garbage on anything.
replies(2): >>42199690 #>>42199702 #
2. dangus ◴[] No.42199690[source]
I took advantage of this in business school. A lot of my professors considered Forbes a reputable business magazine. It was amazing, I could easily cite a source for just about anything I wanted to say.
replies(1): >>42199842 #
3. pimlottc ◴[] No.42199702[source]
Well, of course; “Forbes” still carries prestige and cachet. If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.
replies(1): >>42200052 #
4. lotsofpulp ◴[] No.42199842[source]
Maybe the professors knew and were taking advantage to look the other way to make their job easier.
replies(1): >>42200180 #
5. maeil ◴[] No.42200052[source]
> If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.

It would, as this scam relies on the domain authority, regardless of their "offline authority".

6. dangus ◴[] No.42200180{3}[source]
haha maybe, I got my A’s and my piece of paper, and now I’m qualified to cut costs at your local private equity firm!