(arstechnica.com)

212 points pseudolus | 2 comments | 20 Nov 24 21:07 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

itsoktocry ◴[20 Nov 24 23:13 UTC] No.42199122[source]▶

>>42198115 (OP) #

What's hilarious is when people boast about being "in Forbes" like it's the magazine from 20 years ago, and not this parasitic SEO operation that publishes garbage on anything.

replies(2): >>42199690 #>>42199702 #

1. pimlottc ◴[21 Nov 24 00:26 UTC] No.42199702[source]▶

>>42199122 #

Well, of course; “Forbes” still carries prestige and cachet. If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.

replies(1): >>42200052 #

2. maeil ◴[21 Nov 24 01:22 UTC] No.42200052[source]▶

>>42199702 (TP) #

> If it didn’t, this scam wouldn’t work.

It would, as this scam relies on the domain authority, regardless of their "offline authority".

↑

Google stops letting sites like Forbes rule search for "Best CBD Gummies"