Most active commenters
  • valval(4)
  • aguaviva(4)
  • nradov(3)
  • K0balt(3)

←back to thread

499 points perihelions | 33 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
nabla9 ◴[] No.42191758[source]
October 2023 there was similar incident where Chinese cargo ship cut Balticonnector cable and EE-S1 cable. Chip named 'Newnew Polar Bear' under Chinese flag and Chinese company Hainan Xin Xin Yang Shipping Co, Ltd. (aka Torgmoll) with CEO named Yelena V. Maksimova, drags anchor in the seabed cutting cables. Chinese investigation claims storm was the reason, but there was no storm, just normal windy autumn weather. The ship just lowered one anchor and dragged it with engines running long time across the seabed until the anchor broke.

These things happen sometimes, ship anchors sometimes damage cables, but not this often and without serious problems in the ship. Russians are attempting plausible deniability.

replies(8): >>42191786 #>>42191808 #>>42191875 #>>42191880 #>>42192160 #>>42197213 #>>42197559 #>>42201843 #
cabirum ◴[] No.42192160[source]
After the Nordstream pipeline attacked and destroyed, its reasonable to expect shortened lifetimes for undersea cables and sattelites.
replies(5): >>42192401 #>>42194448 #>>42197215 #>>42198095 #>>42199025 #
nradov ◴[] No.42194448[source]
Yes, this is why having a prompt satellite launch capability to replace attrition losses is now a strategic imperative. We need to be able to put up new ones in a matter of hours, not months.
replies(5): >>42194640 #>>42194810 #>>42196625 #>>42196917 #>>42197964 #
1. littlecranky67 ◴[] No.42196625[source]
Why is that? Undersea cables makes way more sense - the issue is we have maritime law that allows any nation state to freely roam over important cables. During wartimes this is a complete different story - ships won't be allowed near the lines, and if they do get close they will be destoryed without prior warning. No more anchoring "accidents".
replies(5): >>42197587 #>>42197662 #>>42197706 #>>42198738 #>>42199375 #
2. nradov ◴[] No.42197587[source]
It isn't either/or. Satellites and undersea cables serve different use cases. Cables are great for high bandwidth communications between fixed points but they aren't very useful to mobile military forces and they can't be used for anything beyond communications. We don't have enough ships and patrol aircraft to realistically defend undersea cables outside the littorals.

Satellites can serve multiple purposes including communications, navigation, overhead imagery, signals intelligence, weather, etc. They are also vulnerable, but it's possible to launch replacements faster than repairing damaged cables.

3. zelphirkalt ◴[] No.42197662[source]
Inofficially Europe is already at war, whether it wants to or not. Maybe someone needs to inofficially keep a close eye on those cables and take inofficial countermeasures against inofficial sabotage acts.
replies(1): >>42197796 #
4. greenavocado ◴[] No.42197706[source]
We are at war. The United States guided an ATACMS missile into Russian territory yesterday. Imagine the absurdity of if China put missiles on the Mexican border and guided them into missile storage facilities 186 miles inside the border.
replies(4): >>42197957 #>>42198480 #>>42198912 #>>42199619 #
5. delusional ◴[] No.42197796[source]
No we're not. Nobody in the EU has transitioned to a wartime economy. We are helping out a strategic ally. If Ukraine falls tomorrow an cedes add territory to Russia, the EU is not going to continue fighting, because the war will be over.

That of course assumes that Putin stops at Ukraine. The point is that this isn't our war.

replies(3): >>42198124 #>>42198831 #>>42199115 #
6. NovemberWhiskey ◴[] No.42197957[source]
I think you'll find the ATACMS missile guided itself, based on inertial navigation and satellite positioning data. If your argument is that the United States guided the missile because the US provides GPS, that's a pretty flimsy argument.
replies(1): >>42198076 #
7. greenavocado ◴[] No.42198076{3}[source]
Ukraine would have folded within a few weeks without the weapons systems of the combined Western nations. The Biden administration has given Kyiv permission to use U.S.-supplied missiles in Russian territory in a major escalation that now threatens nuclear war due to the first use doctrine updates. A few hours ago reports of UK Storm Shadow missiles being fired into Russian territory emerged. The West is at war.
replies(2): >>42198334 #>>42198607 #
8. K0balt ◴[] No.42198124{3}[source]
You’re in a zero lot line flat and your neighbors house is on fire. I’d be pretty motivated to help out as well, but I don’t think I’d be quite so cavalier about not being on a wartime footing. Russia has shown repeatedly throughout history that it does not honor international agreements in good faith, and that it sees military adventurism as a legitimate way to expand its borders.

After the dust settles on the Ukraine war, if Putin still has the capacity to wage war, he will not likely stop with Ukraine. It is by now obvious that a limited incursion into Poland, for example, will not spark a global thermonuclear war.

Ukrainian suffering is both the litmus test and the vaccination against nuclear escalation that Putin needs to contemplate further expansion.

Political alignments aside, if I were based in Europe I would be very, very concerned.

replies(1): >>42198505 #
9. avereveard ◴[] No.42198334{4}[source]
By that logic every dictator t72 field trip would make Russia participant in that local war... Absolutely absurd statement. Siria civil war would see Russia waging war on Russia since their equipment was in both hands. What a contrived statement that the arm provider is at war itself.
10. jeltz ◴[] No.42198480[source]
As far as we know Ukraine both put them there and guided the missiles. Please provide proof otherwise.
11. valval ◴[] No.42198505{4}[source]
This is a wildly unpopular opinion after 2022, but Ukraine has nothing to do with Europe other than being in close vicinity geographically.

Ukraine is a corrupt third world country competing in the same league with Botswana and Zambia.

replies(3): >>42198817 #>>42199485 #>>42200485 #
12. maximilianburke ◴[] No.42198607{4}[source]
The passive voice is doing a lot of work here.

Who is now threatening nuclear war?

13. amiga386 ◴[] No.42198738[source]
> maritime law that allows any nation state to freely roam over important cables.

I'd like to see your version of maritime law that doesn't allow freely roaming over important cables. Your country's enemies would gladly drop cables totally encircling you and say "uh uh uh, important cables!" if you tried to leave your perimeter

replies(1): >>42199165 #
14. concordDance ◴[] No.42198817{5}[source]
Even Botswana and Zambia aren't in the same league: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-worldbank?...
replies(1): >>42198869 #
15. jyounker ◴[] No.42198831{3}[source]
Nine years ago I was in Riga talking with a Latvian friend, and even then she was telling me how Russia was broadcasting separatist propaganda into Latvia

While the EU may not be at war with Russia, Russia is already at war with the EU.

16. valval ◴[] No.42198869{6}[source]
Frankly Botswana is beating Ukraine in GDP and Zambia in perceived corruption.
replies(1): >>42199581 #
17. anigbrowl ◴[] No.42198912[source]
Why do folks like your self make such foolish analogies? If the US had invaded Mexico like Russia invaded Ukraine then yes, it would be completely fine for Mexico to fire missiles into the US.
18. groby_b ◴[] No.42199115{3}[source]
Yes, we are. Outside of Poland, everybody's closing their eyes to it, but war is coming.

We might be able to stop it before it becomes a hot war, but the ambition is there, the indicators are there, the opportunity is there. Assume it's a war. (Unless you're German. I guess our national sport is now making excuses for Russia)

replies(1): >>42200704 #
19. thejazzman ◴[] No.42199165[source]
This assumes people are very stupid, no? Like, as if they wouldn't know what was happening and just had to let it happen?

I realize US politics may suggest otherwise but I can't imagine the military is just gonna stand by and entertain such a farce..

replies(1): >>42200655 #
20. hex4def6 ◴[] No.42199375[source]
The exercise left for the reader is to choose two countries that are not adjacent,

and try to plot a path between them without crossing an undersea cable:

https://www.submarinecablemap.com/

replies(1): >>42199526 #
21. aguaviva ◴[] No.42199485{5}[source]
This is a wildly unpopular opinion after 2022, but ...

False.

Ukraine not only has everything to do with Europe -- it is unequivocally European in culture, language, historical involvement and (to the extent that Russia is also considered to be unequivocally European) geography.

It isn't something one can even have an opinion about. Any more than one can have an "opinion" about India being a part of Asia.

22. cperciva ◴[] No.42199526[source]
Looks like you can get between Costa Rica and El Salvador without crossing any cables.
23. aguaviva ◴[] No.42199581{7}[source]
Frankly Botswana is beating Ukraine in GDP

Ukraine's GDP is close to 10x that of Botswana, and in the last year has grown 10 percent over that of 2022.

replies(1): >>42202123 #
24. aguaviva ◴[] No.42199619[source]
Imagine the absurdity of if China put missiles on the Mexican border ...

Imagine the US engaging in an invasion of Mexico as equally stupid and unprovoked as Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Then not only would Mexico have a perfect right to seek whatever help it needed to resist the aggression directed at it, we would -- unless we were damned fools -- fully expect Mexico to seek and obtain that help.

replies(1): >>42200018 #
25. geomark ◴[] No.42200018{3}[source]
When people say "unprovoked" do they not know the history, or they think the history doesn't matter, or do they just not care?
replies(1): >>42200098 #
26. aguaviva ◴[] No.42200098{4}[source]
Or they know the history all too well.
27. throwawaymaths ◴[] No.42200485{5}[source]
Yes, and Ukraine has steadily going down in corruption since Zelenskyy. So if you actually care about corruption and aren't a concern troll, you will want to encourage the current regime and not the reverse.
replies(1): >>42202129 #
28. amiga386 ◴[] No.42200655{3}[source]
I think you therefore agree with my reductio ad absurdum argument against the GP's claim. Changing maritime law to prohibit free roaming over "important cables" would be a farce. Therefore, the absence of such a law is not "the issue"
29. K0balt ◴[] No.42200704{4}[source]
I grew up in Fairbanks, Alaska, near a strategic Cold War military base. I still remember seeing the TU-95 “bear” bombers flying overhead being escorted and turned around by our fighter jets.

It makes it pretty real when 7 year old me is wondering if this one has any nukes on board, and if this will be the day that they drop.

Russia is not to be trusted, imho. They do not honor their international commitments in good faith, and they will expand their territorial claims if they are allowed to do so. Europe, like a frog in a pot, is in peril and they need to take steps to make sure that Russian war fighting capabilities are destroyed through exhaustion in Ukraine.

This of course is tragic for Ukraine, because it means that she will be utterly razed in the process. But if Russia prevails or backs down with strength, it will happen again. And again.

Russias ability to project force in a strategic way must be destroyed. They are not trustworthy stewards of coercive force.

replies(1): >>42200818 #
30. nradov ◴[] No.42200818{5}[source]
I don't trust Russia either, but are you certain that's a real memory? I'm not aware of any confirmed incidents in which USSR bombers actually flew within sight of Fairbanks. They routinely tested our defenses but they didn't penetrate that far into US airspace.
replies(1): >>42201095 #
31. K0balt ◴[] No.42201095{6}[source]
I wish I had a photograph. I’ve been told before that this was impossible by others. I’ve also been told by others that were there that yes, it happened. It may not have been , however, an aggressive incursion, I have no way of knowing that part for sure.

Having fighters scramble from Eilison was not unusual at all, and when hunting out in that area with my father we saw a few of those. It was pretty distinct from the training and combat training they did, so it wasn’t that hard to distinguish the intentionality and risk tolerance that was reserved for that kind of urgency.

Anecdotally, I’m pretty darn sure that I saw a bear flying overhead just a few miles east-southeast of Fairbanks. I watched it be turned by 3 F4 phantoms. I was with my father and a few of his friends, as well as my brother that would have been 13 at the time. Everyone there remembers the event, and it was talked about for days in Fairbanks, we even had a subsequent training the next week in my elementary school on survival in the event of a nuclear attack lol.

Perhaps it was some kind of clandestine fuckery, perhaps it was an authorized flight, or perhaps it would have been to embarrassing / inflammatory to make it an event of record? I’m sure the answers are quietly sitting somewhere in a musty filing box.

32. valval ◴[] No.42202123{8}[source]
Try GDP per capita PPP, the measure that matters for average living conditions
33. valval ◴[] No.42202129{6}[source]
Zelenskyy has stifled opposition and politically persecuted his enemies, actually.