←back to thread

324 points alexzeitler | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.826s | source | bottom
Show context
baxtr ◴[] No.42188500[source]
I learned something important early in my career: the first number you put out will be remembered.

Unfortunately it’s often true. People keep saying: "but didn’t you initially say X?"

"Sure I did, but I have new knowledge" won't always work.

A nasty side-effect is that people who are aware of this shy away from giving you numbers.

replies(3): >>42188541 #>>42188563 #>>42191326 #
1. floren ◴[] No.42188541[source]
> Kirk: Mr. Scott. Have you always multiplied your repair estimates by a factor of four?

> Scotty: Certainly, sir. How else can I keep my reputation as a miracle worker?

replies(2): >>42188890 #>>42190657 #
2. dhosek ◴[] No.42188890[source]
There’s a whole generation of developers who have internalized this.
replies(1): >>42188985 #
3. ikiris ◴[] No.42188985[source]
There’s a whole generation of management who have caused this due to their own behavior.
replies(1): >>42189300 #
4. ◴[] No.42189300{3}[source]
5. dtgriscom ◴[] No.42190657[source]
My rule: list all the tasks, estimate times for each task, add up all the estimates, and multiply the results by π. If you're using unknown technology, use π^2.
replies(1): >>42197147 #
6. EasyMark ◴[] No.42197147[source]
I do something similar but I use the Indiana version of 3.2 https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/30214/new-math-time-indi...