Most active commenters
  • pavel_lishin(3)
  • SiempreViernes(3)

←back to thread

Two undersea cables in Baltic Sea disrupted

(www.cnn.com)
577 points mooreds | 12 comments | 18 Nov 24 14:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.214s | source | bottom
Show context
bell-cot ◴[18 Nov 24 14:56 UTC] No.42172843[source]▶
It'd be nice to see stories about a western navy or two getting off its butt, and actually trying to discourage "accidents" which damage critical infrastructure.
replies(5): >>42172868 #>>42172920 #>>42173082 #>>42176146 #>>42176587 #
pavel_lishin ◴[18 Nov 24 14:58 UTC] No.42172868[source]▶
On the other hand, I'd rather see cables get cut than watch shells get lobbed between world powers.
replies(3): >>42172911 #>>42173363 #>>42174101 #
1. myworkinisgood ◴[18 Nov 24 15:01 UTC] No.42172911[source]▶
at these points, these cable cuts are more dangerous than actual bombs
replies(3): >>42172942 #>>42172950 #>>42172966 #
2. pavel_lishin ◴[18 Nov 24 15:05 UTC] No.42172942[source]▶
I'm not convinced that cutting an internet cable - even a vital one - results in more actual death and human misery than actual bombs falling on urban centers.
replies(2): >>42172963 #>>42172975 #
3. bobnamob ◴[18 Nov 24 15:06 UTC] No.42172950[source]▶
? Seriously?

Cables getting cut is only dangerous because it’s an escalation that may lead to bombs. There aren’t thousands of civilians dying because Finland doesn’t have high speed fibre to Germany.

4. matthewdgreen ◴[18 Nov 24 15:06 UTC] No.42172963[source]▶
There is a point where this kind of aggression, left unchecked, may ultimately lead to actual bombs falling on urban centers. It's already happening in Ukraine. The global peace we all enjoy in the West is based on the idea that the price of aggression is higher than the benefits.
replies(1): >>42173025 #
5. SiempreViernes ◴[18 Nov 24 15:07 UTC] No.42172966[source]▶
I'd prefer if the devs added resilience to network outage over having navies fight each other...

Especially as navies are just fundamentally not constructed to defend extended things like a cable: starting a war over them is the best way to ensure every cable is cut.

replies(1): >>42173269 #
6. matthewdgreen ◴[18 Nov 24 15:07 UTC] No.42172975[source]▶
There is a point where this kind of aggression, left unchecked, may ultimately lead to actual bombs falling on urban centers. It's already happening in the Ukraine. The global peace we all enjoy in the West is based on the idea that the price of aggression is higher than the benefits.

Also: Internet cables today, essential power distribution cables tomorrow. Infrastructure is fragile, and human lives will eventually be at stake.

replies(1): >>42173055 #
7. SiempreViernes ◴[18 Nov 24 15:13 UTC] No.42173025{3}[source]▶
"this kind", "left unchecked", "may ultimately"; that's three levels of maybes used to defend a definitive "are more dangerous" claim, not exactly inspiring rigour.
8. pavel_lishin ◴[18 Nov 24 15:15 UTC] No.42173055{3}[source]▶
I mean, you're not wrong. And in general, this is ... high-stakes bullying. And if you let them get away with this, I agree that they'll keep pushing the boundary, even more than they already have;
9. imp0cat ◴[18 Nov 24 15:31 UTC] No.42173269[source]▶
Like it or not, somebody will have to do something about Russia, sooner or later.
replies(1): >>42174758 #
10. SiempreViernes ◴[18 Nov 24 17:36 UTC] No.42174758{3}[source]▶
Could you maybe be specific about what you mean by "somebody" doing "something"?
replies(2): >>42175975 #>>42180529 #
11. rightbyte ◴[18 Nov 24 19:29 UTC] No.42175975{4}[source]▶
'Somebody' is 'the US' and 'something' is 'extended suicide'.
12. imp0cat ◴[19 Nov 24 06:22 UTC] No.42180529{4}[source]▶
Sure, let me find my crystal ball.