Most active commenters
  • pavel_lishin(3)
  • SiempreViernes(3)

←back to thread

577 points mooreds | 24 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source | bottom
1. bell-cot ◴[] No.42172843[source]
It'd be nice to see stories about a western navy or two getting off its butt, and actually trying to discourage "accidents" which damage critical infrastructure.
replies(5): >>42172868 #>>42172920 #>>42173082 #>>42176146 #>>42176587 #
2. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.42172868[source]
On the other hand, I'd rather see cables get cut than watch shells get lobbed between world powers.
replies(3): >>42172911 #>>42173363 #>>42174101 #
3. myworkinisgood ◴[] No.42172911[source]
at these points, these cable cuts are more dangerous than actual bombs
replies(3): >>42172942 #>>42172950 #>>42172966 #
4. toss1 ◴[] No.42172920[source]
They do already, but do need reinforcement.

>>"“We put in place a National Maritime Information Centre in about 2010 and we needed a Joint Maritime Operations Coordination Centre alongside it, because we said very firmly we have to take threats to our territorial seas and exclusive economic zone very, very seriously.

They are now in place, which is good, but they need to be really reinforced and the departments involved need to fully man them, because otherwise we are not going to be able to counter what is a very real and present threat and could cause major major damage to our nation.”" [0]

[0] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-undersea-...

5. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.42172942{3}[source]
I'm not convinced that cutting an internet cable - even a vital one - results in more actual death and human misery than actual bombs falling on urban centers.
replies(2): >>42172963 #>>42172975 #
6. bobnamob ◴[] No.42172950{3}[source]
? Seriously?

Cables getting cut is only dangerous because it’s an escalation that may lead to bombs. There aren’t thousands of civilians dying because Finland doesn’t have high speed fibre to Germany.

7. matthewdgreen ◴[] No.42172963{4}[source]
There is a point where this kind of aggression, left unchecked, may ultimately lead to actual bombs falling on urban centers. It's already happening in Ukraine. The global peace we all enjoy in the West is based on the idea that the price of aggression is higher than the benefits.
replies(1): >>42173025 #
8. SiempreViernes ◴[] No.42172966{3}[source]
I'd prefer if the devs added resilience to network outage over having navies fight each other...

Especially as navies are just fundamentally not constructed to defend extended things like a cable: starting a war over them is the best way to ensure every cable is cut.

replies(1): >>42173269 #
9. matthewdgreen ◴[] No.42172975{4}[source]
There is a point where this kind of aggression, left unchecked, may ultimately lead to actual bombs falling on urban centers. It's already happening in the Ukraine. The global peace we all enjoy in the West is based on the idea that the price of aggression is higher than the benefits.

Also: Internet cables today, essential power distribution cables tomorrow. Infrastructure is fragile, and human lives will eventually be at stake.

replies(1): >>42173055 #
10. SiempreViernes ◴[] No.42173025{5}[source]
"this kind", "left unchecked", "may ultimately"; that's three levels of maybes used to defend a definitive "are more dangerous" claim, not exactly inspiring rigour.
11. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.42173055{5}[source]
I mean, you're not wrong. And in general, this is ... high-stakes bullying. And if you let them get away with this, I agree that they'll keep pushing the boundary, even more than they already have;
12. mikeyouse ◴[] No.42173082[source]
Alas, some would rather let criminal governments invade sovereign countries, commit acts of global sabotage and murder dissidents all over the world rather than take any action at all to dissuade them. Peace through appeasement is likely to work as well as it has at any other point in history.
replies(3): >>42173256 #>>42173277 #>>42175939 #
13. ◴[] No.42173256[source]
14. imp0cat ◴[] No.42173269{4}[source]
Like it or not, somebody will have to do something about Russia, sooner or later.
replies(1): >>42174758 #
15. whythre ◴[] No.42173277[source]
Right? Turns out having a spine is really annoying and inconvenient for the ruling class who now find themselves actually having to fend off interlopers.
16. bell-cot ◴[] No.42173363[source]
There are quite a few response levels between "don't even bother monitoring the sabotage" and "start WWIII".
17. hdjjhhvvhga ◴[] No.42174101[source]
As the saying goes, who lets others cut cables to have peace deserves neither and will have both taken away.
18. SiempreViernes ◴[] No.42174758{5}[source]
Could you maybe be specific about what you mean by "somebody" doing "something"?
replies(2): >>42175975 #>>42180529 #
19. rightbyte ◴[] No.42175939[source]
Are you referring to the US or Russia here? Hard to tell when you talk in riddles.
replies(1): >>42179568 #
20. rightbyte ◴[] No.42175975{6}[source]
'Somebody' is 'the US' and 'something' is 'extended suicide'.
21. heraldgeezer ◴[] No.42176146[source]
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65309687

Russia has a programme to sabotage wind farms and communication cables in the North Sea, according to new allegations.

The details come from a joint investigation by public broadcasters in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland.

It says Russia has a fleet of vessels disguised as fishing trawlers and research vessels in the North Sea.

22. meiraleal ◴[] No.42176587[source]
It is time to get off your high horses and realize that western military might doesn't rule the world anymore.
23. faizmokh ◴[] No.42179568{3}[source]
Not gonna lie. I thought of US first instead of Russia.
24. imp0cat ◴[] No.42180529{6}[source]
Sure, let me find my crystal ball.