←back to thread

213 points cnst | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.416s | source
Show context
galkk ◴[] No.42151363[source]
I love it(in context of FreeBSD):

—————

What does not work: Keyboard, mouse, TB & USB-C ports, thermal/freq mgt.

Conclusion: Highly recommended

replies(6): >>42151580 #>>42151800 #>>42152904 #>>42153400 #>>42154095 #>>42155671 #
cnst ◴[] No.42151800[source]
That was a bit ironic, indeed, but at least the USB-A works!

For what it's worth, the majority of mechanical RGB keyboards and mice are USB-A anyways, so, if you're fine with a very powerful machine that wouldn't have an internal keyboard support for a few weeks, sounds like a good advice anyways!

replies(2): >>42153045 #>>42155930 #
glitchc ◴[] No.42153045[source]
An ARM64 is "a very powerful computer"? The whole promise with ARM is better thermals and long battery life, not screaming performance. With the thermals/cpu not working, we don't even get that.
replies(1): >>42153474 #
viraptor ◴[] No.42153474[source]
M4 crushing benchmarks and AWS running Graviton 2 would disagree on the idea of "whole premise".
replies(2): >>42153567 #>>42156266 #
ksec ◴[] No.42153567[source]
I always knew hardware discussions on HN were below the normal standards. But sometimes I am still surprised at how low it can go.
replies(3): >>42154507 #>>42155219 #>>42156276 #
ahoka ◴[] No.42155219[source]
And it usually ends with some weird implied conclusion, like “AMD-Intel duopoly bad, Apple monopoly good”.
replies(1): >>42156300 #
1. DeathArrow ◴[] No.42156300[source]
I wonder what I would discover if I do some archeology and look at HN discussion when Apple used PowerPC CPUs.
replies(1): >>42156418 #
2. windexh8er ◴[] No.42156418[source]
Considering HN started in 2007 I don't think your expedition will yield a ton from the heyday of Mac PowerPC. Apple shipped the last PowerPC hardware in 2006.