OpenAI, Google and Anthropic are struggling to build more advanced AI

> The AGI bubble is bursting a little bit

I'm surprised that any of these companies consider what they are working on to be Artificial General Intelligences. I'm probably wrong, but my impression was AGI meant the AI is self aware like a human. An LLM hardly seems like something that will lead to self-awareness.

Whether self awareness is a requirement for AGI definitely gets more into the Philosophy department than the Computer Science department. I'm not sure everyone even agrees on what AGI is, but a common test is "can it do what humans can".

For example, in this article it says it can't do coding exercises outside the training set. That would definitely be on the "AGI checklist". Basically doing anything that is outside of the training set would be on that list.

Let me modify that a little, because humans can't do things outside their training set either.

A crucial element of AGI would be the ability to self-train on self-generated data, online. So it's not really AGI if there is a hard distinction between training and inference (though it may still be very capable), and it's not really AGI if it can't work its way through novel problems on its own.

The ability to immediately solve a problem it's never seen before is too high a bar, I think.

And yes, my definition still excludes a lot of humans in a lot of fields. That's a bullet I'm willing to bite.

> Let me modify that a little, because humans can't do things outside their training set either.

That's not true. Humans can learn.

An LLM is just a tool. If it can't do what you want then too bad.