←back to thread

243 points rcarmo | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
purpleblue ◴[] No.41909618[source]
The sheer unadulterated racism from the past is horrifying and sickening. Sure, we still have work to do, but I'm glad we've come so far in the last few decades.
replies(3): >>41911077 #>>41911200 #>>41914318 #
Spooky23 ◴[] No.41911077[source]
It’s still here. We dress it up as voter ID or something similar.
replies(6): >>41911460 #>>41911500 #>>41911651 #>>41912445 #>>41914877 #>>41914967 #
anonfordays ◴[] No.41911460[source]
Voter ID is not racist.
replies(6): >>41911488 #>>41911544 #>>41911673 #>>41911776 #>>41913112 #>>41913748 #
1. defrost ◴[] No.41911488{3}[source]
Like many such policies it's not explicitly racist .. as a procedure it simply disenfranchises some demographics more than others; lower income brackets, people that have had difficult housing and record keepng pasts, indigenous voters on reservation lands lacking mailbox addresses, etc.

It's a mystery how that appears to proportionally exclude along racial and ethnic lines but it's assuredly not that by delibrate intent.

Just a happy accident really?

replies(2): >>41915662 #>>41915956 #
2. giraffe_lady ◴[] No.41915662[source]
A fun fact is that this is specifically the question the academic framework of critical race theory was formed to address. How can systems that are not explicitly racist, that may actually have racial equity as explicit goals, still create racially disparate outcomes. It's an interesting area of study! No wonder people hate it.