Anyone who got the link should be able to delete the file.
This should deter one from using the file sharing tool as free hosting for possibly bad content. One can also build a bot that deletes every file found on public internet.
The combination of limited file availability (reducing the ability to report bad actors), as well as Firefox urls being inherently trusted within orgs (bypassing a lot of basic email/file filtering/scanning), was the reason it became so popular for criminals to use. Like we've seen in the spearfishing attacks in India[1].
[1]: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2020/06/india-hum...
It's discouraging to think that privacy&security solutions for good people might end up being used primarily by bad people, but I don't know whether that's the situation, nor what the actual numbers are.
Imagine some computer work with a class of high school kids, where a teacher has to send them a file... there will be maybe three full downloads max, before someone presses the "delete" button.
Sure, it wouldn't work for a large public setting... but it'd work for many other settings.
"We don't know the contents of the files on our server, so we can't know that is was illegal"
"Fine, delete that file, and we won't charge you for possession this time. Now that you know your service is used for this illegal material, you need to stop hosting material like that."
"How, if we don't know what's in the file sent to our server?"
"... maybe don't take random files you don't know about, and share them on the open web with anonymous users?"
Imagine an image generation model whose loss function is essentially "make this other model classify your image as CSAM."
I'm not entirely convinced whether it would create actual CSAM instead of adversarial examples, but we've seen other models of various kinds "reversed" in a similar vein, so I think there's quite a bit of risk there.
Isn't this - more or less - already happening?
Perpetrators that don't find _some way_ of creating/sharing csam that's low risk get arrested. The "fear of being in jail" is already driving these people to invent/seek out ways to score a 0.1.
They did bust a site owner despite Tor, though. That story's true.
And not "you" unless you are operating a service and this evidence is found in your systems.
This is how "g-men" misinformation of born
If it's just a general cynical "all gubernment is bad and full of pedos" then I'm not sure what the comment adds to this discussion.