←back to thread

276 points leonry | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.429s | source
Show context
Arubis ◴[] No.41889117[source]
Best of luck to the author! My understanding is that anything that makes large file sharing easy and anonymous rapidly gets flooded with CSAM and ends up shuttering themselves for the good of all. Would love to see a non-invasive yet effective way to prevent such an incursion.
replies(10): >>41889269 #>>41889987 #>>41890019 #>>41890075 #>>41890376 #>>41890531 #>>41890775 #>>41892233 #>>41893466 #>>41896754 #
1. KomoD ◴[] No.41889269[source]
> ends up shuttering themselves for the good of all

mostly because it's difficult to handle all the abuse reports

replies(1): >>41889478 #
2. aranelsurion ◴[] No.41889478[source]
I wonder how that'll play out in this case, since everything uploaded here expires at maximum 3 days. Maybe they can "handle" abuse reports by simply auto-responding in 3 days that it is now removed.