←back to thread

Reflections on Palantir

(nabeelqu.substack.com)
479 points freditup | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ak_111 ◴[] No.41864546[source]
Note that Palantir's moral stature isn't as grey or debatable as made in the article, it is basically clearly complicit in the genocide in Gaza.

In other words, if you read the article I would add one more bucket to the three categories the author provided to classify palantir's work - genocide assistance.

from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-jd-vance-peter-thiel-f...

""" Not only did it provide information to the US military during the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, but over the past 10 months in particular, Palantir has provided AI-powered military and surveillance technology support to the Israelis in its war on Gaza.

It has, in the words of Palantir's co-founder Alex Karp, been involved in "crucial operations in Israel".

Palantir says it offers defence technologies that are “mission-tested capabilities, forged in the field” to deliver “a tactical edge - by land, air, sea and space”.

These capabilities include supplying Israel’s military and intelligence agencies with the data to fire missiles at specific targets in Gaza - be it inside homes or in moving vehicles. """

replies(7): >>41864914 #>>41864998 #>>41865059 #>>41865219 #>>41865493 #>>41868070 #>>41869144 #
mulcahey ◴[] No.41864914[source]
The war in Gaza is a moral gray area
replies(1): >>41865024 #
pphysch ◴[] No.41865024[source]
To what extent is repeated mass-murder of civilians, total destruction of healthcare and education systems, etc. part of the "moral gray area"? That's just not a serious argument.

You can be pro-Israel without pretending to hold humanist values and so on.

replies(1): >>41865426 #
dralley ◴[] No.41865426[source]
If you have a military enemy that blatantly hides itself within civilian areas and builds its underground infrastructure underneath civilian infrastructure, and that military enemy kills 1200 of your citizens in an attack, that creates a fair bit of moral ambiguity.
replies(7): >>41865481 #>>41865828 #>>41868147 #>>41868261 #>>41869288 #>>41871027 #>>41871043 #
1. ks2048 ◴[] No.41865481[source]
Imagine the reaction to Palestinians blowing up a residential Israeli apartment building with hundreds of civilians inside and justifying it by saying they wanted to kill an IDF member inside.
replies(1): >>41866663 #
2. shiroiushi ◴[] No.41866663[source]
If the IDF member is shooting at them from the apartment building, then it becomes a valid military target. This is very clearly spelled out in the Geneva conventions.
replies(1): >>41868925 #
3. ndheebebe ◴[] No.41868925[source]
This is a tenuous hypothetical.