←back to thread

752 points dceddia | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.459s | source | bottom
1. 762236 ◴[] No.36447320[source]
It is such a pain to write Win32 code that you didn't have time to add all the features that would slow down program launch.
replies(2): >>36447352 #>>36447374 #
2. sidewndr46 ◴[] No.36447352[source]
As cynical as this comment may be, there may be an element of truth to it. If it is time consuming to add a bunch of visual effects and transitions, you aren't likely to spend time doing that if you could instead be adding useful features.
replies(1): >>36451161 #
3. pkphilip ◴[] No.36447374[source]
I know you probably meant it in jest but as someone who wrote a bunch of desktop apps at one time, it was actually easier to develop desktop apps in tools like Delphi in the 1990s than it is to develop apps now.
replies(2): >>36447485 #>>36450102 #
4. matwood ◴[] No.36447485[source]
For me, VB6 was the pinnacle of Windows desktop app development. When I first starting building web sites/apps it was such a huge step backwards.
replies(2): >>36449008 #>>36449862 #
5. javajosh ◴[] No.36449008{3}[source]
It was/is a huge step backwards in terms of DX, but an infinite step forward for distribution. Distribution is the ONLY problem, which is why the shift happened.
replies(1): >>36457913 #
6. pcdoodle ◴[] No.36449862{3}[source]
Try Xojo Web, pretty neat tool with VB like web builder.
7. mike_hearn ◴[] No.36450102[source]
But, Delphi existed mostly because of the terrible default Microsoft DX. Writing pure Win32 was indeed pretty awful (and still is).
8. kaba0 ◴[] No.36451161[source]
Most software is not developed by a single person and adding animations have very little overlap with most functionality, so it is almost completely parallelizable.
9. matwood ◴[] No.36457913{4}[source]
Absolutely, which is why I (we all really) put up with the mess that is/was web development.