“How America took out the Nord Stream pipeline”

Can someone explain why would they blow up inoperational pipeline that Germany even said is not planning to operate in near future? And if they would have remote explosive wouldn't it make more sense to explode it in the moment of starting the pipeline to make it look more like an accident?

Very helpful comment. I clicked upvote twice

To make absolutely sure Germany does not go behind the US and makes a deal with Russia irregardless of the situation in Ukraine. Backstap before the others can backstap you.

Please don't break the site guidelines like you did here and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34712682. We're trying to avoid flamewar. If you want to make your substantive points thoughtfully, that would be fine.

"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

"Eschew flamebait."

"Don't be snarky."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Alternative hypothetical take - US did it on behalf of German government to avoid the potential political meltdown. Removing this toxic option removed a path to split the society and politics.

If that is the case then there are way more conspirators and the likelihood of the facts getting out are much higher.

Allegedly a "burn the ships" [1] moment. The goal is to prevent any energy spent on even considering going back, the only way is forward.

If Germany has no Russian gas (it's not possible) they won't spend any time even broaching that possibility - the only way forward is to look for other sources (which happened concurrently with the opening of the Baltic pipeline - convenient).

[1] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BurningTheShips

One reason (not arguing it) is so they can blame Putin for it and use it to support how unhinged he is