(seymourhersh.substack.com)

688 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | 08 Feb 23 12:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source

Show context

andrejguran ◴[08 Feb 23 15:13 UTC] No.34709121[source]▶

Can someone explain why would they blow up inoperational pipeline that Germany even said is not planning to operate in near future? And if they would have remote explosive wouldn't it make more sense to explode it in the moment of starting the pipeline to make it look more like an accident?

replies(4): >>34711093 #>>34712612 #>>34713333 #>>34713735 #

1. r00fus ◴[08 Feb 23 19:19 UTC] No.34713333[source]▶

>>34709121 #

Allegedly a "burn the ships" [1] moment. The goal is to prevent any energy spent on even considering going back, the only way is forward.

If Germany has no Russian gas (it's not possible) they won't spend any time even broaching that possibility - the only way forward is to look for other sources (which happened concurrently with the opening of the Baltic pipeline - convenient).

[1] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BurningTheShips

↑

“How America took out the Nord Stream pipeline”