(seymourhersh.substack.com)

688 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | 08 Feb 23 12:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.221s | source

Show context

andrejguran ◴[08 Feb 23 15:13 UTC] No.34709121[source]▶

Can someone explain why would they blow up inoperational pipeline that Germany even said is not planning to operate in near future? And if they would have remote explosive wouldn't it make more sense to explode it in the moment of starting the pipeline to make it look more like an accident?

replies(4): >>34711093 #>>34712612 #>>34713333 #>>34713735 #

miguelazo[dead post] ◴[08 Feb 23 17:07 UTC] No.34711093[source]▶

>>34709121 #

[flagged]

1. dang ◴[08 Feb 23 18:47 UTC] No.34712768[source]▶

>>34711093 #

Please don't break the site guidelines like you did here and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34712682. We're trying to avoid flamewar. If you want to make your substantive points thoughtfully, that would be fine.

"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

"Eschew flamebait."

"Don't be snarky."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

↑

“How America took out the Nord Stream pipeline”