Most active commenters
  • tommymachine(7)
  • staunch(4)

←back to thread

1704 points ardit33 | 16 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
andreasley ◴[] No.24148645[source]
Epic Games has filed a lawsuit [1] and published a Fortnite-themed parody of Apple's "1984" [2] to get some publicity for it.

[1] https://cdn2.unrealengine.com/apple-complaint-734589783.pdf

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euiSHuaw6Q4

replies(8): >>24148908 #>>24149547 #>>24149588 #>>24150052 #>>24150240 #>>24152704 #>>24152926 #>>24155057 #
ulfw ◴[] No.24152926[source]
A PR stunt from Epic and everyone's falling for it.
replies(4): >>24152953 #>>24152955 #>>24153018 #>>24153321 #
0xy ◴[] No.24153018[source]
A PR stunt that consumers and small businesses could benefit from. 30% decimates indie studios and makes some apps fiscally nonviable.
replies(4): >>24153051 #>>24153052 #>>24155232 #>>24155702 #
briandear ◴[] No.24153052[source]
Has it decimated an indie studio? Just curious as to what studios have been decimated.
replies(2): >>24153068 #>>24153120 #
1. tommymachine ◴[] No.24153068[source]
Technically they’ve been triple-decimating everyone, since to decimate is to kill one tenth of
replies(3): >>24153205 #>>24153274 #>>24153290 #
2. mdonahoe ◴[] No.24153205[source]
Thanks, I learned something today!
3. staunch ◴[] No.24153274[source]
You've got two "aCkShuAlly" comments in this thread and they're both wrong.

1. The historical origin of "decimate" does not define the English word. Many words have historical origins that differ with their current definitions.

2. The word "fiscal" does not refer only to "taxes" but also to financial matters in general.

replies(1): >>24153760 #
4. ascorbic ◴[] No.24153290[source]
In Latin, sure, but not in English. It's meant "kill or destroy a large proportion" for centuries. Wait til you hear about "December"
replies(2): >>24153326 #>>24153358 #
5. staunch ◴[] No.24153326[source]
Soon we will be told that a century cannot refer to a 100 year period but only a unit of Roman soldiers. The list of words that no longer mean what they once did is very long and it's lame (and wrong) to "correct" people like this.
replies(1): >>24153425 #
6. tommymachine ◴[] No.24153358[source]
December is actually the tenth month. Jan & Feb were added later. It’s the tenth month that was added, though not the tenth month since the start of the year. The array of calendar months was shifted to make room for two additional months at the beginning of the year.

If I have a son, in December, then I have another son the next year in January, which one is my first son?

replies(2): >>24153417 #>>24153911 #
7. ascorbic ◴[] No.24153417{3}[source]
> Jan & Feb were added later.

At which point it was no longer the tenth month.

replies(1): >>24153863 #
8. tommymachine ◴[] No.24153425{3}[source]
A century can only refer to 100 miles ridden by bicycle
9. tommymachine ◴[] No.24153760[source]
I find it odd that in your first point, you seem to argue that only the most popular, most used dictionary definitions shall count as being “correct” and in your second, you seem to argue just the opposite!

By the way, I never the said the guy was wrong to say fiscally. It was sort of a sloppy usage of the word—in my opinion of course. Which I hope its obvious that this is, seeing as its a comment in a forum!

And I’m certainly not wrong to say that fiscally is to do with taxes. I might have been wrong assuming that he or she was looking for a less ambiguous word. I do tend to assume the best in people, and am often wrong.

replies(1): >>24153875 #
10. tommymachine ◴[] No.24153863{4}[source]
My tenth son will always be my tenth son. Though his birthday falls 10 months after that of my twelfth son (whose birthday came in the second month of the calendar year in which he was born), my tenth son will always have come out of the womb tenth!
replies(1): >>24155854 #
11. staunch ◴[] No.24153875{3}[source]
> "...only the most popular, most used dictionary definitions shall count..."

No, I just understand that words can have multiple definitions and any of them is perfectly valid to use. You were simply wrong to "correct" them in both cases.

Here's what you did:

> "...a comment in a forum"

I think you meant "a comment on a web site" because a forum means an ancient Roman marketplace...see how stupid this game is?

replies(1): >>24154017 #
12. ◴[] No.24153911{3}[source]
13. tommymachine ◴[] No.24154017{4}[source]
I never corrected anyone, nor called anyone stupid— like you have.

Both comments were tongue in cheek.

Apparently since more explanation is clearly warranted, I’ll provide it.

In the comment about fiscally, I thought it odd that the person appeared to be concerned with whether indie developers, of which I am one, were going to be contributing to government revenues, since I’ve only ever heard fiscally used in a tax context by professionals. And certainly when I approach my financial strategy, taxes are always a consequence of the goal, and not the goal itself.

In the other comment, I was making a joke, which seems to have gone a bit over your head.

By the way, a “web site” is simply the location where an arachnid...

replies(1): >>24154105 #
14. staunch ◴[] No.24154105{5}[source]
Nah, I didn't call you stupid. I just meant that those kinds of "technically..." comments are lame and so often wrong. And they create boring threads like the one we're in here :-)

Anyway, I think you get my point and hopefully I wasn't too harsh but sorry if I was. Have a good day/night!

15. dwaite ◴[] No.24155854{5}[source]
> My tenth son will always be my tenth son.

Unless you find you had two other sons you didn't know about.

replies(1): >>24158671 #
16. tommymachine ◴[] No.24158671{6}[source]
In that case, he would have never been my tenth son, I would have only thought he was. No matter how hard we try, birth order is one of those things that can’t be changed, even with a revelation. Our mental model of it can be corrected, but the order itself is immutable.