←back to thread

71 points _mtkq | 1 comments | 06 Feb 20 14:27 UTC | HN request time: 0.325s | source
Show context
k33n ◴[06 Feb 20 15:02 UTC] No.22256435[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(1): >>22256449 #
commandlinefan ◴[06 Feb 20 15:04 UTC] No.22256449[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(1): >>22256477 #
mordae ◴[06 Feb 20 15:08 UTC] No.22256477[source]▶
For how long?
replies(2): >>22256492 #>>22256493 #
LegitShady ◴[06 Feb 20 15:09 UTC] No.22256492[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(1): >>22256605 #
jefurii ◴[06 Feb 20 15:21 UTC] No.22256605[source]▶
It'd be nice to see an example of a socialist county that hadn't been constantly attacked and sabotaged by capitalist countries and allowed to go its own way. Then at least we'd be able to do a fairer comparison.
replies(2): >>22256713 #>>22256730 #
PaulRobinson ◴[06 Feb 20 15:31 UTC] No.22256713[source]▶
France, Denmark, Finland and Sweden all qualify for most American definitions of the term "Socialist".
replies(3): >>22256770 #>>22256782 #>>22256846 #
Turing_Machine ◴[06 Feb 20 15:38 UTC] No.22256770[source]▶
No, they do not. All of those countries have market economies.
replies(3): >>22256858 #>>22258710 #>>22259360 #
1. mercer ◴[06 Feb 20 18:28 UTC] No.22258710[source]▶
Even Lenin, of all people, argued in favor of a (regulated) market economy.

It's a weird of inverse no-true-scotsman argument. I haven't met many socialists who argue in favor of a fully centralized economy. The big discussion, I suppose, is how much should be regulated, and which parts of our society should be 'markets'.