←back to thread

801 points tnorthcutt | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.409s | source
Show context
grannyg00se ◴[] No.7524132[source]
Or...How I would run an online backup service completely unrelated to Tarsnap, with different goals, different priorities, and different ideals.
replies(2): >>7524160 #>>7524213 #
noir_lord ◴[] No.7524160[source]
Yep, I think this is basically the problem with this post, it's Dropbox with an open source client and maybe that is what he doesn't want it to be.
replies(2): >>7524482 #>>7525759 #
patio11 ◴[] No.7524482[source]
If you think Tarsnap is Dropbox with an open source client (but marketed differently), a) you do not understand the engineering reality of Tarsnap (or you have a very... curious understanding of Dropbox) and b) Colin, please note that your marketing is creating fans who think that Tarsnap is Dropbox with an open source client.
replies(2): >>7524807 #>>7525155 #
1. noir_lord ◴[] No.7525155[source]
I meant the product described in the blog post not tarsnap as it currently is.

I'm quite aware of what tarsnap is.

replies(1): >>7525352 #
2. scott_s ◴[] No.7525352[source]
I think Patrick's comment still applies if you think he described "Dropbox with an open source client." Since it's still tarsnap, it still retains all of the security benefits of tarsnap. Saying "open source client" does not capture that.