←back to thread

114 points muellerwolfram | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.006s | source

I hope it didn’t get asked before, I couldn’t find anything.

There was a question recently, about why you don’t improve the HTML of HN, where you said "When the HTML is the most important thing to work on."(http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4927231)

I agree that the markup is relatively unimportant compared to features that I think could really improve the functionality and quality of the site, and I bet you have a long wishlist of features yourself.

But between the lines I interpreted that that list might be way longer, than the time that is available to you, allows you to work on it.

So why don’t you open source HN? I get that with a project that is important to someone, it’s hard to give away control. But you can still be the project lead, you could still have the last call and I feel to open up the project will lead to great feature discussions and ultimately a better hn.

Have you ever considered open sourcing it? And what’s the thought process on your decision?

Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.5006414[source]
Two big reasons people miss:

(a) HN is the front-end and back-end of a bunch of YC business processes.

(b) The voting ring and antispam features rely on obscurity; they are game-able.

The code for older versions of HN is available, but you'd be better off with the code for lobste.rs.

replies(3): >>5006446 #>>5006483 #>>5006769 #
1. brudgers ◴[] No.5006769[source]
The third big reason:

(c) The standard complaints don't matter because they don't impact growth.

There's a message in that.

It is, "Ship."

replies(1): >>5006779 #
2. subsystem ◴[] No.5006779[source]
I would say the look and name of HN do impact growth in certain "demographics". That might even be the idea.
replies(1): >>5006788 #
3. brudgers ◴[] No.5006788[source]
In that vein, discouraging memes, insider jokes, meanness, snark, and flamewars, also impact growth.
replies(1): >>5006872 #
4. subsystem ◴[] No.5006872{3}[source]
Of course, but it can also be engaging. It all depends on what kind of growth you want. For the size of the reader base, it's not very common to see people "on the team" comment something here on HN once the discussion turns opinionated.
replies(1): >>5006913 #
5. brudgers ◴[] No.5006913{4}[source]
It can be engaging when it is engaging. However, the median meme, etc. of the set of all internet discussions is not.