←back to thread

65 points binning | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
xnx ◴[] No.46338971[source]
AI will be a super-tutor for the curious and a tool to outsource all thinking for the incurious.
replies(6): >>46338983 #>>46339024 #>>46339093 #>>46339179 #>>46339227 #>>46339274 #
WhyOhWhyQ ◴[] No.46338983[source]
The job doesn't pay you to be curious. It pays you to get stuff done. Curiosity makes you jobless. Most of the Silcon Valley people who frequent this website larp as curious people, but are basically incurious status seekers.
replies(3): >>46339036 #>>46339121 #>>46339182 #
fn-mote ◴[] No.46339182[source]
> The job doesn't pay you to be curious.

YOUR job doesn’t pay you to be curious.

Well, you could say mine doesn’t either, literally, but the only reason I am in this role, and the driving force behind my major accomplishments in the last 10 years, has been my curiosity. It led me to do things nobody in my area had the (ability|foolishness) to do, and then it led me to develop enough improvements that things work really well now.

replies(2): >>46339280 #>>46339313 #
wrs ◴[] No.46339280{3}[source]
I mean, think of all the people getting paid eight-digit compensation right now because they were curious about this dead-end deep learning stuff 15 years ago for no good reason!
replies(1): >>46339586 #
WhyOhWhyQ ◴[] No.46339586{4}[source]
I couldn't resist... Like the kid at facebook who's buddies with Altman so gets to be a billionare? Like Altman himself (when did he enter the field again? Oh yea he was a crypto huckster). Like everyone I've ever met in the machine learning department? 95% of the people in that field are just following trends and good at winning that game. Call it sour grapes, but I'm just observing reality here. And everyone who thinks following fads = being curious is just doing the larp I described earlier. Moreover, everyone who thinks following fads keeps them safe from AI is deluding themselves. The AI of 2026 can do it better than you can.
replies(2): >>46341123 #>>46345075 #
1. spwa4 ◴[] No.46341123{5}[source]
Didn't Sam Altman write a "friend locator" app that sold for millions after (angrily) refusing to disclose how many users it had? Then it was summarily shut down after acquisition ... and turned out to have never had more than 500 DAU (though appreantly more registrations)

"Loopt"