←back to thread

12 points agentifysh | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.551s | source
Show context
rayiner[dead post] ◴[] No.46283892[source]
[flagged]
1. dare944 ◴[] No.46284082[source]
If they decided the act needed amending where is the 'insanity' in not appealing and instead moving forward with the amendment?
replies(1): >>46284774 #
2. rayiner ◴[] No.46284774[source]
Because it makes it harder for a future Parliament to change the law since it was resolved by a court decision on a constitutional ground instead of an amendment. Also, it’s not clear the amendment would have passed if it wasn’t necessary to comply with the court decision.