12 points agentifysh | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.133s | source
1. ◴[] No.46283989[source]
replies(1): >>46284099 #
2. dare944 ◴[] No.46284082[source]
If they decided the act needed amending where is the 'insanity' in not appealing and instead moving forward with the amendment?
replies(1): >>46284774 #
3. ◴[] No.46284099[source]
4. rayiner ◴[] No.46284774{3}[source]
Because it makes it harder for a future Parliament to change the law since it was resolved by a court decision on a constitutional ground instead of an amendment. Also, it’s not clear the amendment would have passed if it wasn’t necessary to comply with the court decision.