←back to thread

209 points pseudolus | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.899s | source
Show context
pj_mukh ◴[] No.46254203[source]
[flagged]
replies(6): >>46254386 #>>46254541 #>>46254808 #>>46254891 #>>46255504 #>>46256750 #
Pooge ◴[] No.46254386[source]
Their point is that despite being the designers of such systems, they prevent their own children from using them. Akin to a drug dealer not consuming what he sells.
replies(6): >>46254401 #>>46254409 #>>46254432 #>>46254446 #>>46254533 #>>46255312 #
Thorrez ◴[] No.46254533[source]
>“We do limit their time on YouTube and other platforms and other forms of media. On weekdays we tend to be more strict, on weekends we tend to be less so. We’re not perfect by any stretch,”

>He stressed “everything in moderation” is what works best for him and his wife, and that extends to other online services and platforms.

>YouTube’s former CEO Susan Wojcicki, also barred her children from browsing videos on the app, unless they were using YouTube Kids. She also limited the amount of time they spent on the platform.

So they're not completely banning their kids from using YouTube. The current YouTube CEO uses a time limit. The previous YouTube CEO uses a time limit and limits usage to the YouTube Kids app.

Disclosure: I work at Google but not on YouTube.

replies(2): >>46254904 #>>46255431 #
OccamsMirror ◴[] No.46254904[source]
My kids aren’t allowed on YouTube. I run a local system that mirrors approved channels to our home server and serves them through Plex. Creators lose ad revenue; that’s unfortunate. The alternative was nonstop ads on children’s content and a recommendation system pushing garbage. That trade-off was unacceptable.
replies(5): >>46255130 #>>46255434 #>>46255544 #>>46258930 #>>46263116 #
mapontosevenths ◴[] No.46255130[source]
Those ads are optional. You can just pay for it. Its actually pretty good value for the money.

Edit: I forgot to mention Family Link. Once you have a family membership (maybe even before?) You can also use Googles family link to enable a restricted mode that hides adult content for specific accounts.

You actually get a pretty great experience for the whole family for about $20/month.

replies(2): >>46255247 #>>46255275 #
1. nkrisc ◴[] No.46255275[source]
Ads are only half the problem. The real problem with kids using YouTube is it's too easy for them to access any of the content on the platform.

If I could pay YouTube for the privilege of using an app where I choose exactly which videos are available, and no other video will ever appear on or can be accessed from that app, then I might pay for it.

IMO the only way YouTube can be kid-friendly is if there is an app where the primary utility is the ability to whitelist on a per video basis. There could be convenience methods like whitelisting an entire channel's videos with one action, but the whitelist needs to be built around a per video model.

Last I checked, they had nothing remotely like this as an option.

replies(1): >>46255380 #
2. conception ◴[] No.46255380[source]
Youtube Kids has this. You can turn on a whitelisted content only mode. Then only content you share with the kids account shows up.

Approved content only mode.

replies(2): >>46255441 #>>46255483 #
3. barbazoo ◴[] No.46255441[source]
At which point I might as well put it on plex, same effort for tech savvy people.
replies(1): >>46255518 #
4. nkrisc ◴[] No.46255483[source]
Thanks, good to know. Either it didn't exist when I last tried to research it, or I just couldn't find it.
5. conception ◴[] No.46255518{3}[source]
Plex + archive.org is the best. So many great kids shows on there to grab.