Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    YouTube's CEO limits his kids' social media use – other tech bosses do the same

    (www.cnbc.com)
    209 points pseudolus | 14 comments | 13 Dec 25 12:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.192s | source | bottom
    Show context
    pj_mukh ◴[13 Dec 25 12:54 UTC] No.46254203[source]▶
    [flagged]
    replies(6): >>46254386 #>>46254541 #>>46254808 #>>46254891 #>>46255504 #>>46256750 #
    Pooge ◴[13 Dec 25 13:30 UTC] No.46254386[source]▶
    Their point is that despite being the designers of such systems, they prevent their own children from using them. Akin to a drug dealer not consuming what he sells.
    replies(6): >>46254401 #>>46254409 #>>46254432 #>>46254446 #>>46254533 #>>46255312 #
    Thorrez ◴[13 Dec 25 13:58 UTC] No.46254533[source]▶
    >“We do limit their time on YouTube and other platforms and other forms of media. On weekdays we tend to be more strict, on weekends we tend to be less so. We’re not perfect by any stretch,”

    >He stressed “everything in moderation” is what works best for him and his wife, and that extends to other online services and platforms.

    >YouTube’s former CEO Susan Wojcicki, also barred her children from browsing videos on the app, unless they were using YouTube Kids. She also limited the amount of time they spent on the platform.

    So they're not completely banning their kids from using YouTube. The current YouTube CEO uses a time limit. The previous YouTube CEO uses a time limit and limits usage to the YouTube Kids app.

    Disclosure: I work at Google but not on YouTube.

    replies(2): >>46254904 #>>46255431 #
    1. OccamsMirror ◴[13 Dec 25 14:51 UTC] No.46254904[source]▶
    My kids aren’t allowed on YouTube. I run a local system that mirrors approved channels to our home server and serves them through Plex. Creators lose ad revenue; that’s unfortunate. The alternative was nonstop ads on children’s content and a recommendation system pushing garbage. That trade-off was unacceptable.
    replies(5): >>46255130 #>>46255434 #>>46255544 #>>46258930 #>>46263116 #
    2. mapontosevenths ◴[13 Dec 25 15:20 UTC] No.46255130[source]▶
    Those ads are optional. You can just pay for it. Its actually pretty good value for the money.

    Edit: I forgot to mention Family Link. Once you have a family membership (maybe even before?) You can also use Googles family link to enable a restricted mode that hides adult content for specific accounts.

    You actually get a pretty great experience for the whole family for about $20/month.

    replies(2): >>46255247 #>>46255275 #
    3. HelloUsername ◴[13 Dec 25 15:33 UTC] No.46255247[source]▶
    Then you'd be giving money to the Google company as well. You can also look up the content creators and donate directly.
    replies(2): >>46255496 #>>46256536 #
    4. nkrisc ◴[13 Dec 25 15:36 UTC] No.46255275[source]▶
    Ads are only half the problem. The real problem with kids using YouTube is it's too easy for them to access any of the content on the platform.

    If I could pay YouTube for the privilege of using an app where I choose exactly which videos are available, and no other video will ever appear on or can be accessed from that app, then I might pay for it.

    IMO the only way YouTube can be kid-friendly is if there is an app where the primary utility is the ability to whitelist on a per video basis. There could be convenience methods like whitelisting an entire channel's videos with one action, but the whitelist needs to be built around a per video model.

    Last I checked, they had nothing remotely like this as an option.

    replies(1): >>46255380 #
    5. conception ◴[13 Dec 25 15:46 UTC] No.46255380{3}[source]▶
    Youtube Kids has this. You can turn on a whitelisted content only mode. Then only content you share with the kids account shows up.

    Approved content only mode.

    replies(2): >>46255441 #>>46255483 #
    6. barbazoo ◴[13 Dec 25 15:53 UTC] No.46255434[source]▶
    Same here as well as for other streaming. They want to watch the show more than a couple times, I’ll download it. No way I let my kids get brainwashed by these people with their weird algorithms they don’t understand themselves.
    7. barbazoo ◴[13 Dec 25 15:54 UTC] No.46255441{4}[source]▶
    At which point I might as well put it on plex, same effort for tech savvy people.
    replies(1): >>46255518 #
    8. nkrisc ◴[13 Dec 25 15:58 UTC] No.46255483{4}[source]▶
    Thanks, good to know. Either it didn't exist when I last tried to research it, or I just couldn't find it.
    9. lII1lIlI11ll ◴[13 Dec 25 16:00 UTC] No.46255496{3}[source]▶
    Will creators also serve you their content directly?
    10. conception ◴[13 Dec 25 16:03 UTC] No.46255518{5}[source]▶
    Plex + archive.org is the best. So many great kids shows on there to grab.
    11. neom ◴[13 Dec 25 16:06 UTC] No.46255544[source]▶
    I always think if I had kids this is how I'd do it also. I'm an adult who I think has fairly decent critical thinking skills and also is familiar with the state of technology etc etc. Well, I was following the news on 3I/ATLAS and I caught myself watching a youtube channel that I genuinely thought was Michio Kaku, I'd heard him talk once and it sounded and looked like him, so I put it on, switch tabs and listen as I work. I didn't notice it was AI (in retrospect I should have) but after a couple of days of watching it, I started to think...either this guy is worse than Avi Lobe or this channel is fake, the channel was fake and the content was, probably.. 2 or 3 steps removed from reality.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMAFnTANx6A / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXxGWD_dtL0 / https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=michio+kaku+3i+...

    12. mapontosevenths ◴[13 Dec 25 18:07 UTC] No.46256536{3}[source]▶
    What is your objection to paying for the thing you seem to enjoy using?

    Most content creators I've heard of appreciate those who subscribe to YouTube premium. 55% of the cost goes to creators.

    13. tzs ◴[13 Dec 25 22:41 UTC] No.46258930[source]▶
    > I run a local system that mirrors approved channels to our home server and serves them through Plex. Creators lose ad revenue; that’s unfortunate.

    Have your home server note when the kids are watching one of your mirrored channels and launch a browser on a computer the kids cannot see that is watching the same video on YouTube without an ad blocker.

    The video creators then get exactly the same ad revenue and view counts they would have gotten had the kids used YouTube.

    14. Thorrez ◴[14 Dec 25 14:12 UTC] No.46263116[source]▶
    Regarding ads, wouldn't YouTube Premium solve that? Regarding recommendations, YouTube kids allows you to select certain videos, channels, or collections, and only allow your kids to view those that you've selected.

    https://www.youtube.com/intl/ALL_us/kids/parent-resources/