←back to thread

348 points doctoboggan | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.398s | source
Show context
diddid ◴[] No.46240923[source]
Interesting contrast to all this tech is that my wife liked the Rivian, but when I told her they won’t do car play that interest went to 0. Can CarPlay not play nice with these things or do they want to keep all the tech dollars to themselves?
replies(4): >>46240936 #>>46240942 #>>46241358 #>>46244217 #
staticshock ◴[] No.46240942[source]
Direct quote from RJ Scaringe, founder/CEO of Rivian:

> This is a decision. It's generated, I said there's many millions of decisions, many of them will never get noticed and they're just under the surface. One of those decisions that's been noticed quite a bit is the fact that we've intentionally not included CarPlay in the vehicle. And that's not to say we don't think a close partnership with Apple is important. So we have Apple Music integration, we have a bunch of Apple integrations that are yet to come, we have a great relationship with the team at Apple. But it was more to say, we just felt and continue to feel very strongly about creating a consistent, fully integrated digital experience where you're not jumping between apps, let's say from a CarPlay app back to the vehicle app. And it's quite jarring when you don't have, let's say vehicle level controls when you're in the CarPlay environment. That view we've had since the early, early days. I think that's going to become even more important and more true in a world of integrated AI.

https://cheekypint.transistor.fm/14/transcript

replies(4): >>46240960 #>>46241276 #>>46241416 #>>46243522 #
1. FinnKuhn ◴[] No.46243522[source]
All of the mentioned issues are mostly solved with Apple CarPlay Ultra though so this doesn't explain to me why they don't offer that.
replies(1): >>46243629 #
2. IshKebab ◴[] No.46243629[source]
Because the real reason is they don't want you using somebody else's software.