←back to thread

236 points inesranzo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gekoxyz ◴[] No.46232125[source]
I never thought this could happen, especially after the "Ghibli scandal". OpenAI has pulled a majestic business move. They got to allow people to generate Disney characters without issue AND will give 1 billion dollars to OpenAI?

Now the internet will be flooded by Disney character's videos, and since they don't have to pretend they didn't train on their intellectual property anymore I'm really curious to see where this will bring us.

We should rethink copyright btw.

replies(3): >>46232167 #>>46238557 #>>46241525 #
luckydata ◴[] No.46238557[source]
IMHO the smart people saw the "Ghibli scandal" and thought "omg this is the feature of IP".

You don't like the last Star Wars trilogy? Pay us a few hundred dollars and you can rewrite your own story, thank you very much this is where you put the credit card number.

It was INEVITABLE.

replies(1): >>46239126 #
DrewADesign ◴[] No.46239126{3}[source]
I’m pretty sure people don’t want that for the same reason people buy books instead of writing things they want to read. It’s not just to save the effort— stories are good because they surprise, challenge, and inspire us. I think the idea of the “everyone can make the exact movies they want to see” thing conceptually makes sense at first blush, but I just don’t think people want something that matches their assumptions entirely.

Not only that, they’re materially worse than real movies. Designer t-shirts still sell despite people being able to buy blank t-shirts and color them in with laundry markers.

replies(2): >>46239604 #>>46241258 #
1. lmm ◴[] No.46241258{4}[source]
> It’s not just to save the effort— stories are good because they surprise, challenge, and inspire us.

Maybe, but that's the minority of demand. Most book sales are to people looking for something comfortable - think the near-infinite supply of practically interchangeable romance novels or detective stories.