←back to thread

247 points inesranzo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.369s | source
Show context
giancarlostoro ◴[] No.46231943[source]
This will not end well for Disney, there were certain historical characters removed from Sora 2 because people kept making racist videos that are hard to censor, and it became increasingly unhinged. This feels like another circular investment where Disney is hoping to make money back I'm sure. On the other hand, assuming they do the freemium stuff, I look forward to making a few videos of my daughters favorite Disney princesses "talking" to her.
replies(21): >>46231963 #>>46232027 #>>46232049 #>>46232134 #>>46232217 #>>46232316 #>>46232450 #>>46232484 #>>46232594 #>>46232634 #>>46232732 #>>46232770 #>>46232998 #>>46233138 #>>46233293 #>>46233477 #>>46234040 #>>46234843 #>>46235615 #>>46235942 #>>46236727 #
podgietaru ◴[] No.46232634[source]
I actually straight up don't think they give a shit anymore.

I think decorum works in an environment where decorum is the norm, but we have entered a political moment where that is no longer the case. And I think that this kind of thing bleeds so heavily into culture that they no longer give a shit about having their characters next to it.

They have enough plausible deniability; they did not create the content. I think that's enough for them, in this moment.

replies(6): >>46232863 #>>46233453 #>>46233511 #>>46234688 #>>46234886 #>>46241806 #
afavour ◴[] No.46233511[source]
When I became a parent I was really surprised at how much crap Disney puts out. My previous exposure had just been their blockbuster movies which showed a close attention to detail. But you scratch under the surface and it's an endless pile of awful quality clothing, crappy lunchboxes, that kind of thing. To the point where you assume it's an unauthorized rip off until you discover they license to anyone.

And to say nothing of the shoddy quality of their TV shows. Mickey Mouse Clubhouse's lazy CG animation and unimaginative storytelling is shocking given Mickey is supposed to be their signature character. They just don't care. And I think it does have an impact: my kids tired of Clubhouse very quickly and have little connection to Mickey and friends. Compare that to say, Dreamworks’ Gabby’s Dollhouse which they loved.

Disney is propped up by its tentpole features but their bench is incredibly weak. There are only so many Blueys you can buy to make up the difference.

replies(11): >>46233578 #>>46233622 #>>46234432 #>>46234699 #>>46234946 #>>46235081 #>>46235477 #>>46235538 #>>46236137 #>>46237541 #>>46237699 #
mbreese ◴[] No.46236137[source]
> Mickey Mouse Clubhouse's lazy CG animation and unimaginative storytelling

I think it’s important to remember that you probably aren’t their target audience. Their audience expects to see simple characters with simple stories. The CG doesn’t need to be advanced, so having it fast to produce is the goal. It has to hold the interest of a toddler for 25 min without annoying the parents too much. Shiny and simple rendering is probably what they are going for. You can certainly argue about the educational qualities of the show, but I think entertaining was their primary goal for Mickey Mouse Clubhouse.

Also, this show hasn’t been made for years, has it? You’re looking at a show that was produced from 2006-2016. The oldest shows would be almost 20 year old CG. The newest is still nearly 10 years old. At the time it was fresh, the CG was pretty good, compared to similar kids shows.

My kids were young right in this window, and we watched a lot of Disney.

Disney definitely hit a CG valley though that you can see with some of their shows that switched from a 2D look to a more 3D rendering. Thankfully we aged out of those shows around 2015, so it has been a while. Disney has always been a content shop where quantity has its own quality, so I’m sure I’d have similar opinions as you if I was looking at the shows now. But at the time, it wasn’t bad.

I’m not sure how the OpenAI integration will work. I can see all sorts of red flags here.

replies(2): >>46237003 #>>46239380 #
1. cherrycherry98 ◴[] No.46239380[source]
They brought it back this year as Mickey Mouse Clubhouse+. Same vibe, the animation is more polished but still simplistic.