←back to thread

311 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
jameshart ◴[] No.46235444[source]
> naming things after random nouns, mythological creatures, or random favorite fictional characters is somehow acceptable professional practice. This would be career suicide in virtually any other technical field.

Really? Have you specced a microprocessor lately? Seen what pharmaceuticals are called? How polymer compound materials get named?

replies(2): >>46235523 #>>46238797 #
lr0 ◴[] No.46235523[source]
The "Raptor Lake" codename in microprocessors is internal, the product ships with systematic designation. Engineers spec chips by model numbers that encode generation, tier, and performance class.

In Pharmaceuticals, Doctors prescribe "sildenafil," not "Viagra." The generic name describes chemical structure. Brand names are marketing for consumers, not professional nomenclature.

Mythology in chemistry/astronomy has centuries of legacy and connects to human cultural history. Calling an element "Titanium" after Titans carries weight. Calling a SQL replicator "Marmot" connects to... what, exactly? A weekend at the zoo?

replies(4): >>46235548 #>>46235723 #>>46235909 #>>46235910 #
1. nemomarx ◴[] No.46235548[source]
But the names we're talking about are the ones used to market software to users? I don't see how the same logic doesn't apply