←back to thread

386 points italophil | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
praptak ◴[] No.46228088[source]
Calibri was supposedly easier to read by people with disabilities. While this itself is debatable, that's not the reasoning behind the font switch. The mere attempt at making life easier for disadvantaged people is labeled DEI and as such cannot be tolerated by this administration.
replies(6): >>46228261 #>>46228310 #>>46228352 #>>46229561 #>>46229633 #>>46229638 #
midnitewarrior ◴[] No.46228261[source]
I don't think that much thought went into it. The change was initiated by the department's DEIA ("A" for Accessibility) office. Anything that office did was a priority for this administration.

Keep in mind that the transgenic mouse breeding program used to make lab mice for research got defined because the President claimed Democrats were so woke they were funding "trans" mice research.

Half of what they are doing is virtue signalling and posturing without any real understanding of what they are doing.

replies(4): >>46228316 #>>46228358 #>>46228478 #>>46228535 #
rdiddly ◴[] No.46228535[source]
All true except the fact that it's not virtue that they're signaling.
replies(2): >>46228581 #>>46229646 #
ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.46229646[source]
Cruelty signalling?
replies(1): >>46229949 #
oneeyedpigeon ◴[] No.46229949[source]
I prefer "ideology signalling" so that it's neutral and we can use it to apply to both sides.
replies(2): >>46231294 #>>46232309 #
1. watwut ◴[] No.46231294[source]
I prefer cruelty signaling, because there is profound difference between the impact of the two on the world. Insisting on naming things so that "bad thing" and "good thing" are undistinguishable is not neutral, it is biased and favors bad actors.
replies(2): >>46232376 #>>46232859 #
2. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.46232638[source]
Can you be specific about when this has happened?
3. watwut ◴[] No.46232728[source]
1.) Overwhelming majority of political violence is by right wing.

2.) About Kirk specifically, liberals signaled "murder is bad" hard and frequently. Meanwhile Kirk himself signaled hatred.

3.) Meanwhile, Trump, Vance and Hegseth are constantly signaling "murder is good actually, if we are doing it" and "bullying is manly thing to do".

And that is exactly why it is userful to distinguish between "good thing signal" and "bad thing signal".

-----------

Conservatives have the option to signal good things. They make different choice.

replies(1): >>46234941 #
4. oneeyedpigeon ◴[] No.46232859[source]
Sure, but that's immaterial to this context, which seeks an apolitical term for "says things they don't believe to curry favour".
replies(1): >>46238455 #
5. rootusrootus ◴[] No.46234941{3}[source]
> About Kirk specifically

I notice that people are largely staying pretty quiet about the politics of the Kirk murder since shortly after it happened. I assume it is because, to the extent there is evidence of any ideology, groyper fits as well as leftist. Maybe better, even.

6. watwut ◴[] No.46238455[source]
It is material exactly here. The preference for "ideology signaling" comes from desire to frame both sides as the same. "Cruelty signaling" is very accurate descriptor. It does not even suggest right wing only thing, if someone on the left signals cruelty, they would engage in cruelty signaling. And if someone on the right performatively helps poor, they are engaging in virtue signaling.

The trouble is, if the things are called as what they are, you cant say "both sides are the same". Because one side is promoting cruelty and the other is not.

> says things they don't believe to curry favour

If you do not believe that trans people should be beating up, but say so to look manly to your boss, you still promoted beating of trans.