←back to thread

386 points italophil | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chinathrow ◴[] No.46228736[source]
> U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday ordered diplomats to return to using Times New Roman font in official communications, calling his predecessor Antony Blinken's decision to adopt Calibri a "wasteful" diversity move, according to an internal department cable seen by Reuters.

What a waste of government time and spending.

replies(9): >>46229084 #>>46229345 #>>46229486 #>>46229932 #>>46230134 #>>46231399 #>>46231787 #>>46231999 #>>46233031 #
ksynwa ◴[] No.46229084[source]
Calibri is woke?
replies(4): >>46229137 #>>46229341 #>>46229652 #>>46230322 #
klez ◴[] No.46229341[source]
The point being that if the change to Calibri has been done to improve accessibility (hence: inclusion) that makes it woke.

Which is stupid, of course, especially considering that sans-serif fonts improve readability on screens for most people, not for a minority.

EDIT: extraneous "don't" in the middle of a sentence

replies(2): >>46229603 #>>46230203 #
goku12 ◴[] No.46229603[source]
So what next? Wheelchair ramps? Seats for the elderly and the pregnant? Accessibility features don't displace or even inconvenience the majority in any manner. They only make facilities accessible to an additional crowd, who should be getting them as a matter of right in the first place. What's the end game here?
replies(4): >>46229624 #>>46229714 #>>46230443 #>>46236848 #
1. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.46229624[source]
Cruelty is the point
replies(1): >>46232224 #
2. dionian ◴[] No.46232224[source]
Font changes are cruel?
replies(1): >>46232628 #
3. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.46232628[source]
They can be if a font is chosen due to it being easier to read for some people and then it's reverted so that those people will then struggle to read. It's akin to removing ramps from shops to make it awkward for those in wheelchairs.