Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

    (www.reuters.com)
    386 points italophil | 20 comments | 10 Dec 25 00:08 UTC | HN request time: 0.775s | source | bottom
    Show context
    chinathrow ◴[11 Dec 25 07:47 UTC] No.46228736[source]▶
    > U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday ordered diplomats to return to using Times New Roman font in official communications, calling his predecessor Antony Blinken's decision to adopt Calibri a "wasteful" diversity move, according to an internal department cable seen by Reuters.

    What a waste of government time and spending.

    replies(9): >>46229084 #>>46229345 #>>46229486 #>>46229932 #>>46230134 #>>46231399 #>>46231787 #>>46231999 #>>46233031 #
    1. ksynwa ◴[11 Dec 25 08:51 UTC] No.46229084[source]▶
    Calibri is woke?
    replies(4): >>46229137 #>>46229341 #>>46229652 #>>46230322 #
    2. coffeebeqn ◴[11 Dec 25 09:00 UTC] No.46229137[source]▶
    I guess I’m glad they’re focusing on this rather than breaking something else in society
    replies(2): >>46229508 #>>46229520 #
    3. klez ◴[11 Dec 25 09:29 UTC] No.46229341[source]▶
    The point being that if the change to Calibri has been done to improve accessibility (hence: inclusion) that makes it woke.

    Which is stupid, of course, especially considering that sans-serif fonts improve readability on screens for most people, not for a minority.

    EDIT: extraneous "don't" in the middle of a sentence

    replies(2): >>46229603 #>>46230203 #
    4. chinathrow ◴[11 Dec 25 09:58 UTC] No.46229508[source]▶
    Point is they're doing both, at once.
    5. gmueckl ◴[11 Dec 25 10:00 UTC] No.46229520[source]▶
    Nah, the state department is big enough to do both at the same time - at least it would be at full staffing levels.
    6. goku12 ◴[11 Dec 25 10:15 UTC] No.46229603[source]▶
    So what next? Wheelchair ramps? Seats for the elderly and the pregnant? Accessibility features don't displace or even inconvenience the majority in any manner. They only make facilities accessible to an additional crowd, who should be getting them as a matter of right in the first place. What's the end game here?
    replies(4): >>46229624 #>>46229714 #>>46230443 #>>46236848 #
    7. ndsipa_pomu ◴[11 Dec 25 10:17 UTC] No.46229624{3}[source]▶
    Cruelty is the point
    replies(1): >>46232224 #
    8. Muromec ◴[11 Dec 25 10:22 UTC] No.46229652[source]▶
    The font is not masculine enough.
    replies(1): >>46237122 #
    9. ManBeardPc ◴[11 Dec 25 10:29 UTC] No.46229714{3}[source]▶
    The endgame is to normalize punishing groups/individuals for any reason on a whim of the ones in charge. Start with minorities and people who can’t defend themselves, then later you can do easier to anyone who gets inconvenient. Despotism 101.
    10. croes ◴[11 Dec 25 11:45 UTC] No.46230203[source]▶
    Many things labeled as woke benefit the masses like environmental protection.

    I guess people like to stay asleep.

    Will be a rough awakening

    replies(1): >>46231148 #
    11. mikkupikku ◴[11 Dec 25 11:59 UTC] No.46230322[source]▶
    It's just ragebaiting. Don't take the bait.

    If I say I bought a yellow car, nobody cares. If I say I bought a yellow car to troll the libtards, now everybody is mad even though what I said makes no sense and it all has little consequence anyway.

    replies(1): >>46231839 #
    12. ZeroGravitas ◴[11 Dec 25 12:16 UTC] No.46230443{3}[source]▶
    They've been talking about rolling back "DEIA" since they got in power. The A is "accessibility" so they're not hiding this.
    replies(1): >>46230590 #
    13. Propelloni ◴[11 Dec 25 12:32 UTC] No.46230590{4}[source]▶
    That does not make it right.
    14. spicymaki ◴[11 Dec 25 13:32 UTC] No.46231148{3}[source]▶
    > Will be a rough awakening

    I used to believe that people would wake up, but that does not seem to be what happens. They are just herded around by the next dog that comes along.

    replies(1): >>46233658 #
    15. JKCalhoun ◴[11 Dec 25 14:31 UTC] No.46231839[source]▶
    I'm way past raging—just laughing at the stupidity at this point.
    16. dionian ◴[11 Dec 25 15:01 UTC] No.46232224{4}[source]▶
    Font changes are cruel?
    replies(1): >>46232628 #
    17. ndsipa_pomu ◴[11 Dec 25 15:32 UTC] No.46232628{5}[source]▶
    They can be if a font is chosen due to it being easier to read for some people and then it's reverted so that those people will then struggle to read. It's akin to removing ramps from shops to make it awkward for those in wheelchairs.
    18. brookst ◴[11 Dec 25 16:42 UTC] No.46233658{4}[source]▶
    The president of the US struggles to stay awake in his brief detours from the golf course. It’s a perfect metaphor for the country. All seriousness has left the building.
    19. rbanffy ◴[11 Dec 25 20:40 UTC] No.46236848{3}[source]▶
    > What's the end game here?

    There's no end game in particular.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/the-cruelt...

    20. user____name ◴[11 Dec 25 21:04 UTC] No.46237122[source]▶
    All paragraph text to to use the proper manly IMPACT in the future.