(www.reuters.com)

386 points italophil | 3 comments | 10 Dec 25 00:08 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

ebbi[dead post] ◴[10 Dec 25 22:20 UTC] No.46224733[source]▶

[flagged]

youngNed ◴[10 Dec 25 22:27 UTC] No.46224825[source]▶

But.... and this is important, it's not funny.

"Here is a thing that makes a slight difference, with no cost, to a small percentage of people"

"Nah, woke. Let's make it worse for them."

There is nothing funny about performative cruelty

groundzeros2015[dead post] ◴[10 Dec 25 22:29 UTC] No.46224848[source]▶

[flagged]

1. youngNed ◴[10 Dec 25 22:41 UTC] No.46224998[source]▶

Performative? The one that you read about. The one that had a press release, the one that had articles on social media that you are commenting on.

Meaningful? The one that looked into which font was more readable, for the most people

replies(1): >>46225213 #

Do you have trouble reading Times New Roman? Every computer I used growing up used it in much lower resolution.

replies(1): >>46225331 #

3. roughly ◴[10 Dec 25 23:10 UTC] No.46225331[source]▶

No, but I’m also not an accessibility expert, so my opinion here’s pretty irrelevant.

Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri