←back to thread

115 points harambae | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.564s | source
Show context
hardtke ◴[] No.46208389[source]
One of the issues the article doesn't mention is that these houses are effectively cheaper to purchase for corporate owners. Generally they can borrow money at a lower rate, but the ability of corporate owners to use depreciation on a new purchase to offset profits from previous purchases is more significant. Effectively they are redirecting money that would be paid in taxes into the payments on the new purchase.
replies(8): >>46208556 #>>46208610 #>>46208621 #>>46208767 #>>46209057 #>>46209420 #>>46209989 #>>46210020 #
mx7zysuj4xew ◴[] No.46209989[source]
This^, this is how you end up with serfdom
replies(1): >>46211881 #
mx7zysuj4xew ◴[] No.46211881[source]
Ah yes, the down votes have started I forgot that this is a forum for the rent seeking class
replies(1): >>46214935 #
1. lemper ◴[] No.46214935[source]
not really, mate. usually people downvote replies that add nothing of substance or something similar to reddit reaction reply, you get the gist. but yes, this is a forum of rent-seeking class.
replies(1): >>46222212 #
2. red-iron-pine ◴[] No.46222212[source]
nah HN has some pretty aggressive biases.

a lot of temporarily embarrassed millionaires, some of whom may actually cross that threshold.