←back to thread

115 points harambae | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.196s | source
Show context
hardtke ◴[] No.46208389[source]
One of the issues the article doesn't mention is that these houses are effectively cheaper to purchase for corporate owners. Generally they can borrow money at a lower rate, but the ability of corporate owners to use depreciation on a new purchase to offset profits from previous purchases is more significant. Effectively they are redirecting money that would be paid in taxes into the payments on the new purchase.
replies(8): >>46208556 #>>46208610 #>>46208621 #>>46208767 #>>46209057 #>>46209420 #>>46209989 #>>46210020 #
triceratops ◴[] No.46209420[source]
What is this special depreciation corporate owners get? IIUC any landlord can use depreciation to lower their tax bill. Wouldn't the depreciation from a new purchase also apply to the rents from that new purchase?

Somewhat more outrageous is the 1031 exchange. Sell VTI at a profit to buy VOO and the government hits you with a capital gains tax. Sell your primary residence for $250k more than you bought it - same thing. But landlords are a special, privileged investor class to whom these rules don't apply. They can sell a house and pay no taxes on gains as long as they buy another property.

replies(5): >>46209466 #>>46210526 #>>46210658 #>>46210676 #>>46212714 #
1. BeetleB ◴[] No.46210676[source]
> They can sell a house and pay no taxes on gains as long as they buy another property.

As long as they buy another property at least as expensive or more, within a certain time period.

And it's not that they don't pay taxes, it's that the cost basis gets reset. That is the benefit.