←back to thread

115 points harambae | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hardtke ◴[] No.46208389[source]
One of the issues the article doesn't mention is that these houses are effectively cheaper to purchase for corporate owners. Generally they can borrow money at a lower rate, but the ability of corporate owners to use depreciation on a new purchase to offset profits from previous purchases is more significant. Effectively they are redirecting money that would be paid in taxes into the payments on the new purchase.
replies(8): >>46208556 #>>46208610 #>>46208621 #>>46208767 #>>46209057 #>>46209420 #>>46209989 #>>46210020 #
maxerickson ◴[] No.46210020[source]
Build enough housing and all of the sudden it isn't such a sure thing investment.

Not easy to do of course, but the problems that come with building more housing are better then the problems we have now.

replies(1): >>46210055 #
1. Teever ◴[] No.46210055[source]
That may be the case but it would still be a good idea to look at regulating these run away feedback loops writ large so that people can't just play a game of whack-a-mole where they play the same old tricks in different sectors or invent whole new mediums to play the same old games afresh