←back to thread

115 points harambae | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
hardtke ◴[] No.46208389[source]
One of the issues the article doesn't mention is that these houses are effectively cheaper to purchase for corporate owners. Generally they can borrow money at a lower rate, but the ability of corporate owners to use depreciation on a new purchase to offset profits from previous purchases is more significant. Effectively they are redirecting money that would be paid in taxes into the payments on the new purchase.
replies(8): >>46208556 #>>46208610 #>>46208621 #>>46208767 #>>46209057 #>>46209420 #>>46209989 #>>46210020 #
HexPhantom ◴[] No.46209057[source]
It's wild when you think about it: a family scrapes together a down payment and pays full freight on property taxes, while a corporate landlord can roll one property's paper losses into the next deal and keep building their portfolio, tax-deferred
replies(4): >>46209167 #>>46209397 #>>46209524 #>>46211823 #
1. hippich ◴[] No.46209397[source]
Afaik, property taxes are due no matter what, at least in Texas.
replies(2): >>46209692 #>>46210400 #
2. thfuran ◴[] No.46209692[source]
The tax being deferred is income/capital gains.
replies(1): >>46210901 #
3. burnt-resistor ◴[] No.46210400[source]
A lot of veterans live in TX because they have reduced or no property taxes, and also no income taxes. It's probably ~ 8-10% of disabled vets in my neighborhood.
replies(1): >>46210542 #
4. seethishat ◴[] No.46210542[source]
The reduction in property taxes is just for vets, right? I read that, in general, property taxes are high in Texas compared to other states.
replies(1): >>46220802 #
5. ◴[] No.46210901[source]
6. burnt-resistor ◴[] No.46220802{3}[source]
Yep and yep.