Most active commenters
  • abustamam(3)

←back to thread

Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now

(dosaygo-studio.github.io)
3338 points keepamovin | 11 comments | 09 Dec 25 15:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.894s | source | bottom
Show context
tdfirth ◴[09 Dec 25 18:29 UTC] No.46208598[source]▶
Google kills Gemini cloud services is the best one. I can't believe I haven't seen that joke until today.
replies(3): >>46208645 #>>46211235 #>>46212798 #
1. SXX ◴[09 Dec 25 18:33 UTC] No.46208645[source]▶
10 years is way too long for Google. It will be gone in 5 replaced by 3 other AI cloud services.
replies(2): >>46208837 #>>46209281 #
2. tdfirth ◴[09 Dec 25 18:46 UTC] No.46208837[source]▶
You're right. How naive of me.
3. abustamam ◴[09 Dec 25 19:19 UTC] No.46209281[source]▶
I mean Bard barely lasted a year. Arguably Gemini is just a rebrand of Bard, but Bard is still dead.
replies(4): >>46209906 #>>46211868 #>>46212060 #>>46238532 #
4. accumulator ◴[09 Dec 25 20:05 UTC] No.46209906[source]▶
lol already forgot about bard like it was ancient history
5. jvolkman ◴[09 Dec 25 22:55 UTC] No.46211868[source]▶
If you look at web traffic when making Gemini web requests, you'll see that Bard is still in the URL (so are LaMDA (pre-bard) and Assistant (pre-GenAI)):

gemini.google.com/_/BardChatUi/data/assistant.lamda.BardFrontendService/StreamGenerate

replies(1): >>46212449 #
6. pea ◴[09 Dec 25 23:17 UTC] No.46212060[source]▶
Didn't they also just shut down Vertex and Gemini APIs to launch a new unified API this week?
replies(2): >>46214090 #>>46217147 #
7. abustamam ◴[10 Dec 25 00:10 UTC] No.46212449{3}[source]▶
That's interesting! I wonder how many parts of their other dead projects are used in current projects.
8. samarthr1 ◴[10 Dec 25 04:29 UTC] No.46214090{3}[source]▶
Finally that turf war ends
9. malnourish ◴[10 Dec 25 12:53 UTC] No.46217147{3}[source]▶
I can't find any news about this. That's not wholly unusual given the context. Do you have a link?
10. chrislozeau ◴[11 Dec 25 23:00 UTC] No.46238532[source]▶
Bing Chat suffered the same fate
replies(1): >>46252503 #
11. abustamam ◴[13 Dec 25 06:22 UTC] No.46252503{3}[source]▶
Tbh I never even heard of that!