←back to thread

176 points davnicwil | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Hey HN! Like most here regular meetings have always been a big part of my work.

Over the years I've learned the value of active note taking in these meetings. Meaning: not minutes, not transcriptions or AI summaries, but me using my brain to actively pull out the key points in short form bullet-like notes, as the meeting is going on, as I'm talking and listening (and probably typing with one hand). This could be agenda points to cover, any interesting sidebars raised, insights gotten to in a discussion, actions agreed to (and a way to track whether they got done next time!).

It's both useful just to track what's going on in all these different meetings week to week (at one point I was doing about a dozen 1-1s per week, and it just becomes impossible to hold it in RAM) but also really valuable over time when you can look back and see the full history of a particular meeting, what was discussed when, how themes and structure are changing, is the meetings effective, etc.

Anyway, I've tried a bunch of different tools for taking these notes over the years. All the obvious ones you've probably used too. And I've always just been not quite satisfied with the experience. They work, obviously (it's just text based notes at the end of the day) but nothing is first-class for this usecase.

So, I decided to build the tool I've always felt I want to use, specifically for regular 1-1s and other types of regular meetings. I've been using it myself and with friends for a while already now, and I think it's got to that point where I actually prefer to reach for it over other general purpose note taking tools now, and I want to share it more widely.

There's a free tier so you can use it right away, in fact without even signing up.

If you've also been wanting a better system to manage your notes for regular meetings, give it a go and let me know what you think!

Show context
raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46202268[source]
Well to address the elephant in the room. There is no world that I wouldn’t or shouldn’t be automatically fired for putting notes between myself and my employer in a none approved website I found on the web.
replies(4): >>46202289 #>>46203290 #>>46203317 #>>46204681 #
davnicwil ◴[] No.46202289[source]
It won't be today but my goal is to earn a place on your org's approved list one day and win you as a customer :-)

Relatedly, I've had a few requests for a self hosted version already and will be offering this very soon as a priority. If that'd solve the issue also, please email me at davnicwil at gmail and I will update you when it's available.

replies(1): >>46202384 #
raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46202384[source]
I hate to be mean. But you never will earn a place as a one man unknown developer to be an offering at my company and be a place where we put all of our information for both confidentially reasons and we wouldn’t trust the long term viability of your company.

We already use Lattice for performance notes, peer to peer feedback and it’s a place where we put notes for our 1:1s. It integrates with Slack to remind us to enter topics before the meeting, etc.

Even with all of those objections, you won’t get anywhere in corporate America with your product unless you offer SSO. It’s not that hard to do.

I have recommended a one man SaaS once in my career to something that was critical to what I needed for a large company critical initiative. But we got lawyers involved and negotiated our own instance and the code be put in escrow with a third party that we would get access to under certain circumstances. We were going to be 70% of his post sign in revenue and growing.

replies(5): >>46202527 #>>46202905 #>>46202998 #>>46204697 #>>46205749 #
Oxodao ◴[] No.46202527{3}[source]
Yeah, so there's no way to make a new company? Unless you're directly bought by Atlassian because they are "known enough"?

I don't know Lattice so I would not use it.

replies(3): >>46202583 #>>46202625 #>>46202827 #
1. FinnKuhn ◴[] No.46202827{4}[source]
Offering a selfhosted or local version would probably help alleviate those concerns.
replies(1): >>46202875 #
2. davnicwil ◴[] No.46202875[source]
I'll be doing this as a priority. I wanted to check there was concrete demand for it first, but I've now had enough requests that I'll be doing it.

If anyone wants to be updated when this is available, email me at davnicwil at gmail