←back to thread

Wayland Nvidia

(kextcache.com)
64 points breve | 1 comments | 04 Dec 25 10:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
juliangmp ◴[08 Dec 25 15:52 UTC] No.46193724[source]▶
Careful there, I was almost able to see some parts of the article through the ads
replies(2): >>46193772 #>>46194016 #
jjuel ◴[08 Dec 25 15:55 UTC] No.46193772[source]▶
Came to say something about the ads too. Ended up not even reading the article it was so bad.
replies(1): >>46193825 #
kachapopopow ◴[08 Dec 25 15:59 UTC] No.46193825[source]▶
It feels surprising that there's people on hackernews without adblock considering that adblock is not just for blocking ads, but also malware, illegal tracking and blocking annoying and useless banners.
replies(5): >>46193860 #>>46193925 #>>46193964 #>>46194101 #>>46216288 #
nottorp ◴[08 Dec 25 16:05 UTC] No.46193925[source]▶
Well I run an ad blocker too, but maybe we should try browsing submitted URLs without blocking ads and only upvote them IF we can still read them like that.
replies(1): >>46197094 #
1. everdrive ◴[08 Dec 25 20:19 UTC] No.46197094{3}[source]▶
I take a similar approach, but with noscript. If you cannot read it without enabling js, then I won't read the article.