←back to thread

336 points mohi-kalantari | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neilalexander ◴[] No.46194859[source]
I would think that if they actually spent the time and money fixing the core functionality of their core products (like Windows and Office) that they might have a much easier time promoting things like Copilot. Instead they leave their users wondering why they're so hell-bent on shoehorning AI into a Start menu that takes whole seconds longer to open than it should or into Windows Search that regularly fails to find installed programs or local files.
replies(7): >>46194925 #>>46194942 #>>46194963 #>>46195067 #>>46195157 #>>46195245 #>>46195382 #
coldpie ◴[] No.46195067[source]
Microsoft is a public company. That means their primary product is not products or services, it's their stock. Selling products & services can be an advertisement for their stock, but there are other methods of convincing people to buy their stock, too. Currently the stock market only wants stocks that have "AI" associated with them. It doesn't matter whether users like it or not, because having a viable business is not what the stock market is currently focused on. So, Microsoft is doing what they need to do to sell their primary product: shove AI into everything.
replies(5): >>46195081 #>>46195161 #>>46195214 #>>46195424 #>>46196013 #
saubeidl ◴[] No.46195081[source]
Maybe the stock market is not a good system to organize ones economy around then?
replies(2): >>46195304 #>>46195359 #
mrweasel ◴[] No.46195359[source]
The stock market weirdly enough ruins the idea of capitalism. Catering to shareholders hurts the idea that competition would create better and cheaper products.
replies(3): >>46195423 #>>46195494 #>>46195570 #
zem ◴[] No.46195423[source]
that's not the idea of capitalism; the idea of capitalism is that you should be able to make money by virtue of owning stuff. it's an inherently rich-get-richer scheme, competition has little to do with it.
replies(1): >>46195581 #
graemep ◴[] No.46195581[source]
I think its obvious the GP means free market capitalism, which is what almost everyone who favours capitalism thinks is the form it should take.
replies(5): >>46195728 #>>46195848 #>>46195940 #>>46195984 #>>46196023 #
Draiken ◴[] No.46195984[source]
Talk about utopia huh?

Free markets never existed, don't exist and never will. Markets are defined by laws and regulations in which they exist in. They can't ever be "free".

replies(2): >>46196004 #>>46196309 #
1. graemep ◴[] No.46196004[source]
I agree. A free market requires regulation to ensure competition otherwise it ceases to be a free market.