←back to thread

Wayland Nvidia

(kextcache.com)
64 points breve | 4 comments | 04 Dec 25 10:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
juliangmp ◴[08 Dec 25 15:52 UTC] No.46193724[source]▶
Careful there, I was almost able to see some parts of the article through the ads
replies(2): >>46193772 #>>46194016 #
jjuel ◴[08 Dec 25 15:55 UTC] No.46193772[source]▶
Came to say something about the ads too. Ended up not even reading the article it was so bad.
replies(1): >>46193825 #
kachapopopow ◴[08 Dec 25 15:59 UTC] No.46193825[source]▶
It feels surprising that there's people on hackernews without adblock considering that adblock is not just for blocking ads, but also malware, illegal tracking and blocking annoying and useless banners.
replies(5): >>46193860 #>>46193925 #>>46193964 #>>46194101 #>>46216288 #
1. mnmalst ◴[08 Dec 25 16:01 UTC] No.46193860[source]▶
Totally agree. Every time I see someone complaining about ads, I think "What ads?"
replies(1): >>46193944 #
2. a012 ◴[08 Dec 25 16:06 UTC] No.46193944[source]▶
Their adblock shamming overlay is also blocking part of the screen (on mobile) by the way
replies(2): >>46194000 #>>46194514 #
3. kachapopopow ◴[08 Dec 25 16:10 UTC] No.46194000[source]▶
brave seems to have some special sauce since it appears to be able to hide the fact that ads were removed. I am guessing they are doing so without triggering dom events.
4. prmoustache ◴[08 Dec 25 16:47 UTC] No.46194514[source]▶
Don't see that overlay on fennec + adblock, what are you using?