←back to thread

126 points petermcneeley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
appreciatorBus ◴[] No.46177701[source]
> "We don't want to spend half a year of our lives locked up in barracks, being trained in drill and obedience and learning to kill," the organisers of the protests wrote in a statement posted on social media. "War offers no prospects for the future and destroys our livelihoods."

Is the idea that it’s better for your livelihood to just start learning how speak Russian now?

replies(22): >>46177893 #>>46177896 #>>46177900 #>>46177918 #>>46177951 #>>46177965 #>>46178025 #>>46178027 #>>46178156 #>>46178204 #>>46178403 #>>46179097 #>>46179705 #>>46179889 #>>46179918 #>>46179969 #>>46180303 #>>46180543 #>>46180807 #>>46181263 #>>46182810 #>>46197927 #
venturecruelty ◴[] No.46177896[source]
I think a lot of young people look at all of the wars waged post-WWII and are rightfully opposed to fighting for their governments. Would you want to die for nothing in Vietnam? Probably not, and a lot of other people didn't want to as well. Some of them did anyway, and it was all for nothing.

So please have some grace if today's kids have looked back at our miserable history and have decided that they'd rather not die for a country that doesn't seem to give a shit about them.

replies(6): >>46177909 #>>46177966 #>>46178062 #>>46179675 #>>46181816 #>>46182146 #
wkat4242 ◴[] No.46178062[source]
Exactly. Even after Vietnam, in this century. Iraq war 2 was all false pretenses. And the resulting power vacuum created ISIS. Afghanistan accomplished absolutely nothing, things are back to the way it was and all the deaths were for nothing.

The only fairly recent war that the west was involved in that was slightly justified was the first gulf war. But even that wasn't really any of America's business. It wasn't that they actually cared about the Kuwaiti people. Just the oil.

replies(3): >>46178432 #>>46182632 #>>46185269 #
1. C6JEsQeQa5fCjE ◴[] No.46182632[source]
> and all the deaths were for nothing

Deaths and destruction in wars against significantly weaker countries are never for nothing, as certain well-connected people always get filthy rich, regardless of the end result. The ones who make the decisions, they always get their share, whether through the war hardware industry, mercenary business, the reconstruction industry, the resource exploitation industry, or something else. The wider population might end up worse off and poorer, but who has ever asked them about anything when there is so much money to be made by their ''democratic representatives'' if they play along?