←back to thread

176 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
darshanime ◴[] No.46094064[source]
since zig is famously decentralized, i don't think there is a way to effectively combat bad actors like these? there is no "official zig org" that can disown them
replies(2): >>46094077 #>>46094096 #
1. pa7ch ◴[] No.46094096[source]
Its the opposite in my understanding. Zig has a BDFL.

Trademarks are the usual cudgel of choice to enforce a bad actor claiming to be part of offcial Zig.

replies(1): >>46094697 #
2. testdelacc1 ◴[] No.46094697[source]
But he isn’t. He’s just writing an AI slop book about Zig. Surely there’s nothing legally wrong with that? He never said it’s an official book or backed by the Zig project.

The trademark cudgel is used on people who release an incompatible language that they insist on calling Zig, confusing people who want to try Zig. Or people who add malware to the Zig tool chain and try to distribute that.

Trademark can’t be used to control bad actors like zigbook.