←back to thread

15 points elinear | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jalapenos ◴[] No.45909552[source]
Correct me if wrong, but this looks like a severe own-goal for the democrats? A long shutdown to try and force something - as a minority party, using the senate 60 vote threshold quirk, that they didn't get?
replies(4): >>45909912 #>>45910089 #>>45910367 #>>45910454 #
infamouscow ◴[] No.45909912[source]
This is correct.

The Democrats are in a new world. They've lost a cultural and information hegemony they had for 40 years, and thus, the playbook of the past doesn't work (for a variety of reasons).

replies(1): >>45909956 #
bediger4000 ◴[] No.45909956[source]
The 48 years from 1932 to 1980, maybe. The US has been decidedly conservative since Reagan. SCOTUS hasn't been liberal since Nixon got Rehnquist as chief justice.
replies(3): >>45909980 #>>45910423 #>>45911560 #
jalapenos ◴[] No.45911560[source]
The US is conservative? Are we talking about the same place that's been the social justice woke ideology fountainhead since forever?

The one where a man can one day declare he's now a woman because he say's so - and that'll get him on the cover of a magazine as a "hero"?

What's your starting point for left - Mao?

replies(1): >>45911740 #
1. cosmicgadget ◴[] No.45911740[source]
Wouldn't self-determination of individuals and magazines be at home both with progressives and libertarians?
replies(1): >>45912450 #
2. jalapenos ◴[] No.45912450[source]
I mean it'd be at home with lunatic asylums too depending on what you self-determine but yeah sure