←back to thread

251 points QiuChuck | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sbszllr ◴[] No.45892481[source]
As someone who has a mirrorless scanning setup for my film, and pondered getting a dedicated scanner... the price of this is quite steep given how inflexible of a tool it is.

A second hand DSLR setup is going to be roughly the same price or less. I'm also not sure what kind of workflow improvements it actually offers. If you want fancy and experimental, filmomat has arguably a more interesting but pricier offering.

But naysaying aside, I hope they manage to find a niche that allows them to survive as a company, and keep the analog photography revival alive.

replies(4): >>45892677 #>>45892703 #>>45892752 #>>45893614 #
deinonychus ◴[] No.45892703[source]
I almost missed the price. Wow you're right that's a lot! And the final retail price is 1599 euros. I have a good Plustek that cost me $300 or $400. Automated transport and unantiquated software sounds nice, but those features are not worth an extra $600-1,100 to me.

Am I missing something or is this supposed to be in another tier of image quality?

replies(3): >>45892857 #>>45894628 #>>45895620 #
1. spott ◴[] No.45894628[source]
Dynamic range is much better (120dB is ~20 stops, your plustek is ~12 stops.

If that matters, I’m not sure.